2021
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.759250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A PD-L1 Negative Advanced Gastric Cancer Patient With a Long Response to PD-1 Blockade After Failure of Systematic Treatment: A Case Report

Abstract: BackgroundIt was widely accepted that programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive, tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumor are prone to have better treatment response to immune checkpoint blockade. The value of immune checkpoint blockade in PD-L1 negative gastric cancer patients has been questioned due to lower objective response rate (ORR).Case PresentationWe report an unusual case of a PD-L1 negative, proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/microsatellite stability (MSS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(19 reference statements)
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the results of immune cell analysis confirmed that levels of both CD45 + and CD8 + T cells were significantly higher after nivolumab intervention. Consistent with the data from previous studies ( 31 , 32 ), these results provide further evidence that PD-L1 expression is not a direct indicator of the tumor suppressive activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors, as nivolumab sharply suppressed tumor activity despite the absence of PD-L1 in the tumor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, the results of immune cell analysis confirmed that levels of both CD45 + and CD8 + T cells were significantly higher after nivolumab intervention. Consistent with the data from previous studies ( 31 , 32 ), these results provide further evidence that PD-L1 expression is not a direct indicator of the tumor suppressive activity of immune checkpoint inhibitors, as nivolumab sharply suppressed tumor activity despite the absence of PD-L1 in the tumor.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…PD-L1 expression is an initial screening marker for tumor patients receiving immunotherapy. However, some reports have demonstrated that the expression of PD-L1 is not fully indicative of the effect of immunotherapy ( 31 , 32 ). Indeed, some patients with low expression of PD-L1 still achieve good therapeutic results following PD-L1 antibody treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ECOG PS 1 in our case confirmed that the prognosis of patients with a PS of ≤1 is better than in those with a PS of ≥2 (40). In contrast, it has been reported that for GC PD-L1-negative patients with highefficiency mismatch repair (PMMR)/MSS and TMB-1, immune checkpoint blockade can also achieve good outcomes after systematic treatment failure (41)(42)(43). One article reported that a patient received only four doses of nivolumab, discontinued any anti-tumor treatment in the next 12 months, and successfully achieved complete remission and long-term maintenance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…The ECOG PS 1 in our case confirmed that the prognosis of patients with a PS of ≤1 is better than in those with a PS of ≥2 ( 40 ). In contrast, it has been reported that for GC PD-L1-negative patients with high-efficiency mismatch repair (PMMR)/MSS and TMB-1, immune checkpoint blockade can also achieve good outcomes after systematic treatment failure ( 41 43 ). One article reported that a patient received only four doses of nivolumab, discontinued any anti-tumor treatment in the next 12 months, and successfully achieved complete remission and long-term maintenance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%