2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-017-2140-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A PCR-free point-of-care capacitive immunoassay for influenza A virus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another difference is that ACET velocity will become stronger with increasing fluid ionic strength, while DEP velocity will decrease through the influence of Clausius–Mossotti factor. Order of magnitude estimation of ACEK velocities using equations in our previous work and a DNA length of 52 μm found that the ratio of average DEP velocity to ACET velocity is calculated to be 278, suggesting that pDEP will be the dominant enrichment mechanism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another difference is that ACET velocity will become stronger with increasing fluid ionic strength, while DEP velocity will decrease through the influence of Clausius–Mossotti factor. Order of magnitude estimation of ACEK velocities using equations in our previous work and a DNA length of 52 μm found that the ratio of average DEP velocity to ACET velocity is calculated to be 278, suggesting that pDEP will be the dominant enrichment mechanism.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Another difference is that ACET velocity will become stronger with increasing fluid ionic strength, while DEP velocity will decrease through the influence of Clausius-Mossotti factor. Order of magnitude estimation of ACEK velocities using equations in our previous work [52] and a DNA length of 52 m [53] found that the ratio of average DEP velocity to ACET velocity is calculated to be 278, suggesting that pDEP will be the dominant enrichment mechanism. In order to evaluate and optimize the effect of AC electrical fields, two different voltages (10 and 25 mV) are applied and the sensor responses to various concentration of HSV-1 DNA in 2 × SSC are given in Fig.…”
Section: Sensor Performance Under Different Applied Voltagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Многопараметричний аналіз генетичного матеріалу з використанням ДНК-мікроматриць (мікрочипів), представляючих собою массив іммобілізованих на твердій фазі олігонуклеотидів, здатних специфічно звязуватися с детектуючими послідовностями. Для ідентифікаціїі типування вірусу грипу підтипів H1N1 та H7N9 описані мікрочипи двух типів: ДНКмікроматриці високої щільності і спеціалізовані олігонуклеотидні мікрочипу [21]. До недоліків мікрочипів низької щільності відноситься їх неуніверсальність: вони придатні тільки для ідентифікації і типування вірусу грипу, або субтипування вірусу грипу А, або для аналіза стійкості до обмеженої кількості антивірусних препаратів.…”
Section: пдрф аналіз та електрофореграма до рестриктазunclassified
“…Although PCR techniques have been developed for more than 30 years, the operation is still complicated, and the required turnaround time cannot be shorter than several hours [15]. Based on the good specificity and versatile sensing mechanisms, bio-probe based sensors for virus detection are becoming more practicable in recent years as promising approaches [19][20][21]. Also due to the high specificity, reproducibility, and stability, antibody based detections of causative agent are continually adopted in food safety detection [29,30].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%