1996
DOI: 10.3127/ajis.v4i1.371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Pattern-Oriented Approach to a Methodical Evaluation of Modeling Methods

Abstract: The paper describes a pattern-oriented approach to evaluate modeling methods and to compare various methods with each other from a methodical viewpoint A specific set of principles (the patterns) is defined by investigating the notations and the documentation of comparable modeling methods. Each principle helps to examine some parts of the methods from a specific point of view. All principles together lead to an overall picture of the method under examination. First the core ("method neutral") meaning of each … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…1. the adequacy or completeness of the modeling method in being able to represent the underlying reality [Amberg, 1996;Bajaj and Ram, 1996;Brosey and Schneiderman, 1978;Kramer and Luqi, 1991;Moynihan, 1996;Siau, 2004], 2. the readability of the modeling method's schemas [Hardgrave and Dalal, 1995;Shoval and Frummerman, 1994], and 3. how easy it is to use the modeling method to represent requirements [Bock and Ryan, 1993;Kim and March, 1995;Shoval and Even-Chaime, 1987;Siau and Cao, 2001].…”
Section: Relevance Rigormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. the adequacy or completeness of the modeling method in being able to represent the underlying reality [Amberg, 1996;Bajaj and Ram, 1996;Brosey and Schneiderman, 1978;Kramer and Luqi, 1991;Moynihan, 1996;Siau, 2004], 2. the readability of the modeling method's schemas [Hardgrave and Dalal, 1995;Shoval and Frummerman, 1994], and 3. how easy it is to use the modeling method to represent requirements [Bock and Ryan, 1993;Kim and March, 1995;Shoval and Even-Chaime, 1987;Siau and Cao, 2001].…”
Section: Relevance Rigormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using this approach, Bajaj & Ram (1996) specify a content specification for conceptual process models and use it to analyze the Data Flow Diagram Model and the Integrated Definition Standards Model. Similarly, Amberg (1996) specifies a guiding set of principles that can be used to evaluate conceptual models. Wand & Weber (1995) use an ontology of systems proposed by Bunge, (1979) to analyze information systems.…”
Section: Non-empirical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reengineer a process, we have to compare AsIs model (current state) with ToBe model (state that we would like) (Amberg, 1996).…”
Section: Educational Processes At Higher Education Institutionmentioning
confidence: 99%