A Patient Outcomes–Driven Feedback Platform for Emergency Medicine Clinicians: Human-Centered Design and Usability Evaluation of Linking Outcomes Of Patients (LOOP)

Abstract

Background The availability of patient outcomes–based feedback is limited in episodic care environments such as the emergency department. Emergency medicine (EM) clinicians set care trajectories for a majority of hospitalized patients and provide definitive care to an even larger number of those discharged into the community. EM clinicians are often unaware of the short- and long-term health outcomes of patients and how their actions may have contributed. Despite large volumes of patients and data, outcomes-driven learning that targets individual clinician experiences is meager. Integrated electronic health record (EHR) systems provide opportunity, but they do not have readily available functionality intended for outcomes-based learning. Objective This study sought to unlock insights from routinely collected EHR data through the development of an individualizable patient outcomes feedback platform for EM clinicians. Here, we describe the iterative development of this platform, Linking Outcomes Of Patients (LOOP), under a human-centered design framework, including structured feedback obtained from its use. Methods This multimodal study consisting of human-centered design studios, surveys (24 physicians), interviews (11 physicians), and a LOOP application usability evaluation (12 EM physicians for ≥30 minutes each) was performed between August 2019 and February 2021. The study spanned 3 phases: (1) conceptual development under a human-centered design framework, (2) LOOP technical platform development, and (3) usability evaluation comparing pre- and post-LOOP feedback gathering practices in the EHR. Results An initial human-centered design studio and EM clinician surveys revealed common themes of disconnect between EM clinicians and their patients after the encounter. Fundamental postencounter outcomes of death (15/24, 63% respondents identified as useful), escalation of care (20/24, 83%), and return to ED (16/24, 67%) were determined high yield for demonstrating proof-of-concept in our LOOP application. The studio aided the design and development of LOOP, which integrated physicians throughout the design and content iteration. A final LOOP prototype enabled usability evaluation and iterative refinement prior to launch. Usability evaluation compared to status quo (ie, pre-LOOP) feedback gathering practices demonstrated a shift across all outcomes from “not easy” to “very easy” to obtain and from “not confident” to “very confident” in estimating outcomes after using LOOP. On a scale from 0 (unlikely) to 10 (most likely), the users were very likely (9.5) to recommend LOOP to a colleague. Conclusions This study demonstrates the potential for human-centered design of a patient outcomes–driven feedback platform for individual EM providers. We have outlined a framework for working alongside clinicians with a multidisciplined team to develop and test a tool that augments their clinical experience and enables closed-loop learning.

Integration and Implementation of Scaled Agile Framework and V-Model in the Healthcare Sector Organization

“…Arandia, Garate, and Mabe present a methodology for designing and developing embedded medical devices while minimizing economic investment during periods of technical risk and supporting customer feedback [29]. In other cited articles, agile methodologies are used to develop software for crisis management during the COVID-19 pandemic [71] and to improve user interfaces in medical software [72].…”

Applying user-centered design to improve drinking water consumer confidence reports: A Baltimore case study

“…User-centered design is used to design interventions that better serve the community. This approach has yielded much success in areas as diverse as emergency department clinician systems and community smoking cessation counseling [15,16]. The study protocol adapted the process defined and applied by colleagues at the Maryland Institute College of Art's (MICA) Center for Social Design [17,18].…”

Improving drinking water consumer confidence reports: Applying user-centered design

“…This approach has yielded much success in areas as diverse as emergency department clinician systems and community smoking cessation counseling. (13,14) The study protocol adapted the process defined and applied by colleagues at the Maryland Institute College of Art's (MICA) Center for Social Design. (15,16) This design process allowed public water supply users in Baltimore City to create new ways to convey water quality information.…”