A Patient-Centered Framework for Evaluating Digital Maturity of Health Services: A Systematic Review

Abstract

BackgroundDigital maturity is the extent to which digital technologies are used as enablers to deliver a high-quality health service. Extensive literature exists about how to assess the components of digital maturity, but it has not been used to design a comprehensive framework for evaluation. Consequently, the measurement systems that do exist are limited to evaluating digital programs within one service or care setting, meaning that digital maturity evaluation is not accounting for the needs of patients across their care pathways.ObjectiveThe objective of our study was to identify the best methods and metrics for evaluating digital maturity and to create a novel, evidence-based tool for evaluating digital maturity across patient care pathways.MethodsWe systematically reviewed the literature to find the best methods and metrics for evaluating digital maturity. We searched the PubMed database for all papers relevant to digital maturity evaluation. Papers were selected if they provided insight into how to appraise digital systems within the health service and if they indicated the factors that constitute or facilitate digital maturity. Papers were analyzed to identify methodology for evaluating digital maturity and indicators of digitally mature systems. We then used the resulting information about methodology to design an evaluation framework. Following that, the indicators of digital maturity were extracted and grouped into increasing levels of maturity and operationalized as metrics within the evaluation framework.ResultsWe identified 28 papers as relevant to evaluating digital maturity, from which we derived 5 themes. The first theme concerned general evaluation methodology for constructing the framework (7 papers). The following 4 themes were the increasing levels of digital maturity: resources and ability (6 papers), usage (7 papers), interoperability (3 papers), and impact (5 papers). The framework includes metrics for each of these levels at each stage of the typical patient care pathway.ConclusionsThe framework uses a patient-centric model that departs from traditional service-specific measurements and allows for novel insights into how digital programs benefit patients across the health system.Trial RegistrationN/A

Smart Government Success Factors

“…in digitalization programs or digital offices). They emphasized that the lower a public administration's digital maturity -understood as the extent to which the application of digital technologies facilitate high-quality service (Flott, Callahan, Darzi & Mayer 2016: 2) -is, the more intense such a centralization impulse must be. However, the more digitally mature an organization is or becomes over time, the more centralization should be reduced again.…”

Digital maturity: are we ready to use technology in the NHS?

“…7,14 This benefits care providers by revealing variation across services, institutions, organisations and regions of the health and social care system. 15 This electronic exchange has the capability to identify where variability in care standards and quality are present. 2, 14,16…”

“…Digital maturity is dependent on strategies that necessitate an organisation functions collaboratively and with an ethos compatible with the wider NHS transformational healthcare agenda. Flott et al 15 outline significant problems with global DMA frameworks as they currently exist. Frameworks are currently unable to evaluate care pathways over time and offer no evidence of how digital maturity can ease a patient's entire care pathway.…”

Health informatics competencies in postgraduate medical education and training in the UK: a mixed methods study

“…Both in the UK and internationally, there is growing appetite to quantify and improve the digital maturity of health systems 6–9. The universal relevance of HI is exemplified by the WHO’s recent adoption of a digital health resolution, led by India,10 and the urgency is amplified by the ambition of recent investments in precision medicine11 12 and artificial intelligence 13.…”