A Pathway to Small Satellite Market Growth

Abstract

The United States is experiencing a renaissance in interest in space due to the advent of new lowercost small spacecraft. New launch entrants, such as Interorbital Systems, promise to lower launch cost levels. Many developers also benefit from free-to-developer launch services from NASA or the ESA. Unfortunately, existing commercial off the shelf (COTS) CubeSat hardware is priced based on amortization of design costs across low-sales volume. A lack of trained staff in any one of the numerous disciplines required for spacecraft design or other resources required for in-house development restricts entry into the small satellite industry to those who can afford expensive COTS hardware or pay for significant design expenses. With entry-level satellite hardware still priced in the six-figure range, limited market growth is expected even as the average CubeSat launch cost continues to decline. A new archetype could lower barriers to entry for building small satellites. A free, public-domain architecture for building a small satellite could allow low-cost, in-house satellite development. Under this paradigm, the expenses for initiating a small satellite program are limited to component and launch vehicle costs. The proposed framework allows for broad access to small satellite hardware, greatly increasing the size of the small satellite developer community. In the context of the small satellite market, freely offering plans to construct an entry-level satellite will court new non-traditional actors into building space hardware for launch on commercial and government small satellite launchers. The low-cost, high flight rate possible with the next generation of launch systems affords operators the freedom to experiment and innovate in a risktolerant environment. Successfully demonstrating products and services utilizing low-risk, publicdomain plans will stimulate demand for mature and more capable flight systems in the retail marketplace. If technical schools, community colleges, universities, small businesses and even amateurs can enter into the small satellite ecosystem, at an affordable entrance price, a positive spiral of increasing demand and decreasing cost may be created over time. A free, public domain satellite architecture may, thus, open the door to sustained growth and commercial opportunity for the small satellite industry. A. K. Nervold et al.15

A Systematic Review of Hardware-Accelerated Compression of Remotely Sensed Hyperspectral Images

“…This would lead to further increases in the cost of acquiring and launching such satellite systems. It is especially true when knowing that the estimated cost to build one CubeSat unit is between 50,000 and 200,000 USD and that a similar amount is required for the launching of the built system [ 163 ].…”

Spatiotemporal event detection: a review

“…Hyperspectral and multispectral imaging compose of multiple, 100s, and up to 1000 bands can detect and monitor much more detailed Earth surface targets for, e.g. crop health monitoring, mineral inspection, and fine-scale monitoring of hazardous pollutants (Debba et al 2005 More recently, increasing numbers of cost-effective small satellites are being developed and launched (Nervold et al 2016;Madry, Martinez, and Laufer 2018) to provide a low-cost platform for various missions, such as establishing constellations for low-cost communication systems and education in satellite development and operation (Gao et al 2018). Similarly, short-observation time and lightweight hyperspectral imaging sensors have been embedded in unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to provide high spatial resolution (1-50 cm) and flexible operational feasibilities (Zhong et al 2018).…”

Next-Generation Digital Ecosystem for Climate Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery: A Review of Digital Data Collection Technologies

“…There are now more working satellites deployed by fledgling space startups than by established government space agencies (McCabe et al, 2017 ). Private companies have stated plans to lower the costs of CubeSAT satellites, miniaturized space satellites, from $50,000 to $200,000 to even < $10,000 per satellite (Nervold et al, 2016 ), with anticipated costs even lower for ChipSATs, smaller, postage-stamp versions of CubeSATs (Abate, 2019 ). The low cost of satellites, UAVs, and other sensing technologies may allow for greater opportunities for data collection, especially in gap filling where other satellites may miss out on daily or more detailed measurements (Witze, 2018 ).…”