2010
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2010.137
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pathway-based gene signature correlates with therapeutic response in adult patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Abstract: Biomarkers to predict response to therapy in adults with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph þ ) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) are not yet established. In this study, we performed a meta-analysis of earlier genome-wide gene expression studies to identify pathway-based genes that are associated with therapeutic response. The predictive power of these genes was validated by transcript profiling in diagnostic bone marrow samples from Ph þ ALL patients using a quantitative real-time PCR array. Gene expressi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the same has not been achieved in the case of adult B‐ALL. Philadelphia chromosome–positive ALL (Ph + ALL) accounts for approximately one‐third of adult B‐ALL cases , whereas cytogenetic alterations that serve as predictors of favorable prognosis in pediatric B‐ALL, such as t(12,21)(p13;q22) and high hyperdiploidy, are less frequent in adult patients with B‐ALL . Therefore, cytogenetic differences are likely to explain the difference in therapeutic outcome between adult and pediatric ALL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the same has not been achieved in the case of adult B‐ALL. Philadelphia chromosome–positive ALL (Ph + ALL) accounts for approximately one‐third of adult B‐ALL cases , whereas cytogenetic alterations that serve as predictors of favorable prognosis in pediatric B‐ALL, such as t(12,21)(p13;q22) and high hyperdiploidy, are less frequent in adult patients with B‐ALL . Therefore, cytogenetic differences are likely to explain the difference in therapeutic outcome between adult and pediatric ALL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MRD monitoring and BCR/ABL KD mutation are irreplaceable for the successful management of Ph + ALL patients [2] . Nevertheless, 30% of the patients treated with imatinib relapse in a short time interval [13] and there are still some obstructions that remain to be settled on the way to therapy optimization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, regarding the gene expression patterns in ALL, Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) ALL was correlated with the presence of ABL1 mutations and IKZF1 deletion. Among the BCR/ABL-like genes, the correlated genes were IGH@CRLF2, NUP214-ABL1, EBF1-PDGFRB, BCRJAK2, STRN3-JAK2, IGH@-EPOR, ∆-CRLF2 and IKZF1 deletion [ 25 ]. In ALL with TCR translocations and various oncogenes t(1;14) t(10;14) t(5;14), the genes involved are LMO1, LMO2, TAL1, TLX1, and TLX3, while in the Del(1)(p32) translocation, SIL-TAL1 is the gene involved.…”
Section: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemiamentioning
confidence: 99%