2016
DOI: 10.1017/s0007087416001175
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pathology of progress? Locating the historiography of cancer

Abstract: Despite its prominent position in today's medical research, popular culture and everyday life, cancer's history is relatively unwritten. Compared to the other great 'plagues' - cholera, tuberculosis or tropical fevers, to name but a scant handful - cancer has few dedicated pages in the general surveys, and its specialists have largely failed to convince the broader community of medical historians - or indeed historians of anything at all - that histories of the disease can tell us fundamental things about the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From maps of the Victorian cancer landscape to becoming the "emperor of all maladies," histories of cancer regularly avoid specificity and engage the multiple ways in which cancer and its metaphors have shaped experiences, politics and cultures of sickness in the twentieth century. 27 The anthropologist and historian Julie Livingston finally returns to comorbidity to describe the veiled experiences of emerging cancers and to problematize the powerful taxonomies between infectious disease, non-infectious conditions and risk-factors within the co-occurring epidemics of TB, HIV, hypertension and diabetes in Botswana. 28 Disease specificity, from the ubiquitous perspective of living and dying comorbid lives around the globe can appear as a somewhat misleading "intellectual conquest."…”
Section: Comorbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From maps of the Victorian cancer landscape to becoming the "emperor of all maladies," histories of cancer regularly avoid specificity and engage the multiple ways in which cancer and its metaphors have shaped experiences, politics and cultures of sickness in the twentieth century. 27 The anthropologist and historian Julie Livingston finally returns to comorbidity to describe the veiled experiences of emerging cancers and to problematize the powerful taxonomies between infectious disease, non-infectious conditions and risk-factors within the co-occurring epidemics of TB, HIV, hypertension and diabetes in Botswana. 28 Disease specificity, from the ubiquitous perspective of living and dying comorbid lives around the globe can appear as a somewhat misleading "intellectual conquest."…”
Section: Comorbiditymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer is often referred to as the “Pathology of the Century” assuming the connotations of an endemic disease spread throughout the world. It has also been defined as the “the modern disease par excellence” (Roy Porter) or even the “the quintessential product of modernity” (Siddhartha Mukherjee) (Bynum and Porter, 2005 ; Mukherjee, 2011 ; Arnold-Forster, 2016 ). These two definitions are universally recognized and are justified by the drastic increase in incidence and mortality, witnessed since the end of the eighteenth century until today, where cancer represents the second leading cause of death worldwide (Ferlay et al, 2015 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancer, the second prime reason for deaths around the world is frequently mentioned as the “Pathology of the Century” presuming the connotations of an endemic disease expanding all around the globe. It has also been explained as “the modern disease par excellence” (Roy Porter) or even the “quintessential product of modernity” (Siddhartha Mukherjee) (Arnold‐Forster, 2016; Bynum et al, 1993; Mukherjee, 2011). The most fundamental trait of cancer or the mass of cells is their capability to survive ahead of their normal life span and to maintain chronic proliferation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%