1966
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(66)90442-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pathologic-arteriographic correlation of renal arterial disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

4
78
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
4
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A pathological classification of renal artery FMD was proposed by McCormack et al [3][4] It was based on the dominant arterial wall layer involved: the intima, media or adventitia. Intimal FMD, which accounts for 5 % of renal artery FMD cases, is characterized by irregularly arranged mesenchymal cells within a loose matrix of subendothelial connective tissue and a fragmented internal elastic lamina.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A pathological classification of renal artery FMD was proposed by McCormack et al [3][4] It was based on the dominant arterial wall layer involved: the intima, media or adventitia. Intimal FMD, which accounts for 5 % of renal artery FMD cases, is characterized by irregularly arranged mesenchymal cells within a loose matrix of subendothelial connective tissue and a fragmented internal elastic lamina.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such pathologic changes are demonstrated by a "string-of-beads" appearance via angiography. [4][5][6] The "string-of-beads" appearance, which angiographically characterized medial FMD, occurs in about 70 % of cases. Specific features of adventitial or intimal FMD cannot be shown using angiography.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The present study is the first in which coarctation as a cause of RAS was evidenced clinically. It is noteworthy that 32 years ago, McCormack et al 10 Renal arteries are divided into the adaptive remodeling and coarctation groups according to the relative MBA at the target site (Ͼ85% and Յ85%, respectively). Values are meanϮSD and represent the averaged results of the 2 independent observers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%