2008
DOI: 10.1002/nme.2371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A partition‐of‐unity‐based finite element method for level sets

Abstract: SUMMARYLevel set methods have recently gained much popularity to capture discontinuities, including their possible propagation. Typically, the partial differential equations that arise in level set methods, in particular the Hamilton-Jacobi equation, are solved by finite difference methods. However, finite difference methods are less suited for irregular domains. Moreover, it seems slightly awkward to use finite differences for the capturing of a discontinuity, while in a subsequent stress analysis finite elem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, the enrichment functions are the key of the XFEM. In the previous studies, the most common way to describe the cracks was the level set method . For the description of crack surface, the level set method considers the crack as the level set function; the crack separates the mesh into two parts in a proper range of the mesh in which one part is considered as the upper surface of the crack, and the other part is considered as the lower surface of the crack.…”
Section: A Novel Geometric Methods In the Framework Of Xfemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Meanwhile, the enrichment functions are the key of the XFEM. In the previous studies, the most common way to describe the cracks was the level set method . For the description of crack surface, the level set method considers the crack as the level set function; the crack separates the mesh into two parts in a proper range of the mesh in which one part is considered as the upper surface of the crack, and the other part is considered as the lower surface of the crack.…”
Section: A Novel Geometric Methods In the Framework Of Xfemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the previous studies, the most common way to describe the cracks was the level set method. [22][23][24][25][26] For the description of crack surface, the level set method considers the crack as the level set function; the crack separates the mesh into two parts in a proper range of the mesh in which one part is considered as the upper surface of the crack, and the other part is considered as the lower surface of the crack. For the description of the crack tips, the location of the crack tips must be obtained to determine the nodes that are enriched by the crack tip enrichment.…”
Section: A Novel Geometric Methods In the Framework Of Xfemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We must therefore conclude that the shape functions proposed in [14] are not suitable for electro-mechanical modeling in the vicinity of conductors. It was shown in [28] that arbitrary Dirichlet boundary conditions can be imposed along an arbitrary contour using a regularization. In the following section, a different extended field is build to circumvent this shortcoming.…”
Section: Moës Bi-materials Shape Functionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Une méthode de résolution est proposée par les auteurs dans [18]. La première équation du système 9 est résolue par l'utilisation d'une formulation faible du problème linéarisé alors que la condition aux limites est respectée par l'utilisation de fonctions de forme enrichies respectant la partition de l'unité [19].…”
Section: Vers L'exploration Numérique Des Transformations De Phaseunclassified