2012
DOI: 10.1109/tec.2012.2219533
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Particle Swarm Optimization-Based Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm for PV Systems Operating Under Partially Shaded Conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
220
0
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 478 publications
(222 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
220
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed EGWO algorithm is compared with conventional GWO MPPT algorithm (Satyajit et al 2016) and most implemented Particle Swarm Optimization MPPT algorithms (Liu et al 2012) under similar conditions. The parameters of three algorithms are mentioned in Appendix.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The proposed EGWO algorithm is compared with conventional GWO MPPT algorithm (Satyajit et al 2016) and most implemented Particle Swarm Optimization MPPT algorithms (Liu et al 2012) under similar conditions. The parameters of three algorithms are mentioned in Appendix.…”
Section: Comparative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors proposed MPPT algorithms based on Particle Swarm Optimization -Liu et al 2012, Artificial Bee Colony (Sundareswaran et al 2015), Ant Colony Optimization (Jiang et al 2013), Cuckoo Search (Ahmed et al 2014), Firefly (Sundareswaran et al 2014), Grey Wolf Optimizer (Satyajit et al 2016) and Whale Optimization Algorithm (Santhan et al 2016). All these algorithms differ noticeably in terms of accuracy, efficiency, tracking time and complexity (Jordehi 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is depicted from this figure that, PV is working at MPP with tracking efficiency of 99.94%. The MPP tracking efficiency has been calculated by taking the ratio between averaged output power obtained under steady state and maximum available power of the PV array [11]. As the solar Array Simulator from Agilent Technologies (E4360A) has been used here, the maximum available power, P max is the maximum power point of the PV module.…”
Section: Experimental Validation Of Single Phase Semi-z-source Invertmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past literature many techniques and algorithms for tracking the maximum power from the PV array have been discussed. These techniques include perturb and observe (P&O) [7], incremental conductance [8,9], particle swarm optimization [10,11], fuzzy control [12,13], neural network based schemes [14], etc. Perturb and observe and incremental conductance algorithms are the most used among these algorithms because of their suitability and simplicity to implement for any PV array as well as during implementation no information about the PV array is required.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible for conventional algorithms to be trapped on a local maximum [9,10]. Many MPPT algorithms have been proposed for the PS condition [11][12][13][14][15], however they are complicated and/or require long tracking times.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%