2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2005.01.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A partially integrated airline crew scheduling approach with time-dependent crew capacities and multiple home bases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, parameter ( ) 9 . 0 , 7 means that the satisfaction value from time 5 to 9 is approximately 7 and the possibility to finish sightseeing of place i in time 9 and move to a next sightseeing place after time 9 is 0.9.…”
Section: A Parameters In Our Proposed Model Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For instance, parameter ( ) 9 . 0 , 7 means that the satisfaction value from time 5 to 9 is approximately 7 and the possibility to finish sightseeing of place i in time 9 and move to a next sightseeing place after time 9 is 0.9.…”
Section: A Parameters In Our Proposed Model Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, and hence, our proposed model is formulated as the following TEN-based tour planning problem (TEN-TPP) maximizing the total tourist satisfaction: (9) However, this problem is a fuzzy programming problem with fuzzy satisfaction values ( ) t t a ij ′ , and hence, we need to set some optimal criterion for the fuzzy objective function in order to solve this problem in mathematical programming problem. Thus, it is important for the tourist to maximize the total satisfaction values in tour planning for sightseeing as much as possible.…”
Section: Objective Function and Formulation Of Our Proposed Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These problems are commonly categorized into flight scheduling design, fleet assignment, aircraft maintenance routing and crew scheduling (Dawid et al, 2001). In these problems, crew scheduling problems are well-known as one of the most difficult problems in the airlines (Guo et al, 2006). There are commonly two phases in the airline crew scheduling problems: the crew pairing problems and the crew rostering problems.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The upper bound is improved by a metaheuristic algorithm. The effectiveness of the proposed method for a large scale rostering problem is shown from computational experiments.Application of two-phase decomposition algorithm to practical airline crew rostering problem for fair working time cost (Moudani et al, 2001;Maenhout and Vanhoucke, 2010), minimizing the most important cost (Guo et al, 2006), maximizing the utility of the rosters (Dawid et al, 2001), and the main objective is to minimize the operational cost and the second objective is to minimize the deviation of the working time (Souai and Teghem, 2009). Few works consider the crew satisfaction as an objective function.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%