2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00477-014-0908-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A partial ensemble Kalman filtering approach to enable use of range limited observations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a way to do that, Borup et al. s*() proposed a DA scheme, namely PDEnKF, to solve the Bayesian system in Equation . The authors assumed the OR observation likelihood to be constant outside the observable range.…”
Section: Methodology and Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a way to do that, Borup et al. s*() proposed a DA scheme, namely PDEnKF, to solve the Bayesian system in Equation . The authors assumed the OR observation likelihood to be constant outside the observable range.…”
Section: Methodology and Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the geostatistical techniques are well established for variables without dynamical evolution (Chiles and Delfiner, ; Emery and Robles, ), only one study (Borup et al. , ), to the best of our knowledge, has dealt with the issue of OR observations in an ensemble‐based data assimilation framework. The issue has been addressed in variational methods (see (Bocquet et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This approach is more efficient for large non-linear models than non-ensemble based Kalman filters [5]. Furthermore, research has shown that the EnKF can even be used to utilize information from range-limited observations when the observed quantity is outside the observable range of the gauge [10], which is a very common situation for gauges in urban drainage systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer based dynamic operation of urban drainage systems in real-time is therefore an attractive tool to avoid combined sewer overflows, minimise the risk of pluvial flooding, achieve better wastewater treatment during wet-weather and to optimise the • methods for updating model states (directly from measurements as in [14,15], or by using Kalman filtering approaches as in [16][17][18]), • error correction methods (e.g., using time series models as in [19], or neural networks as in [20]), • and in some cases joint state and parameter estimation approaches (for example, using particle filtering approaches as in [21] or an evolutionary algorithm as in [22]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%