2008
DOI: 10.1007/s00607-008-0005-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parity domination problem in graphs with bounded treewidth and distance-hereditary graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…. We point out that Mu Li designed a polynomial algorithm to derive ML G (x) [27] and some relevant complexity results for determining ML G (x) for tree-like graphs G can be found in [16,32]. For our present purposes, it is pertinent to ask what is the complexity of calculating ML * G (x).…”
Section: Conjecture 8 It Holds For Any Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. We point out that Mu Li designed a polynomial algorithm to derive ML G (x) [27] and some relevant complexity results for determining ML G (x) for tree-like graphs G can be found in [16,32]. For our present purposes, it is pertinent to ask what is the complexity of calculating ML * G (x).…”
Section: Conjecture 8 It Holds For Any Graphmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We explain these structural properties in more detail in Section 2. This structure has led to the development of a number of algorithms for distance-hereditary graphs [7,29,27,30,41,36,22]. Given the above, we view the vertex deletion problem for distance-hereditary graphs as a first step towards handling Rank-width-t Vertex Deletion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In another recent paper, Gassner and Hatzl [13] discuss an even more general parity domination problem from an algorithmic point of view: for every vertex v, we impose exactly one of the following four constraints:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%