1993
DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.60-515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Parametric Variation of Delayed Reinforcement in Infants

Abstract: This study is an exploration of the parameters of delayed reinforcement with 6 infants (2 to 6 months old) in two experiments using single-subject repeated-reversal designs. In Experiment 1, unsignaled 3-s delayed reinforcement was used to increase infant vocalization rate when compared to a differential-reinforcement-of-other-than-vocalization condition and a yoked, no-contingency comparison condition. In Experiment 2, unsignaled 5-s delayed reinforcement was used to increase infant vocalization rate when com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We expected that the infants were able to associate the cue with the event that was temporally separated. The delay period was comparable with that used in previous behavioral studies, in which 3-month-old infants were conditioned using a 5 s delay of reinforcement and 6-month-old infants performed the oculomotor response with delays of up to 5 s [32], [33]. Each presentation of an auditory event was followed by a rest period (15.5 s) for the cerebral blood flow induced by the event to return to baseline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…We expected that the infants were able to associate the cue with the event that was temporally separated. The delay period was comparable with that used in previous behavioral studies, in which 3-month-old infants were conditioned using a 5 s delay of reinforcement and 6-month-old infants performed the oculomotor response with delays of up to 5 s [32], [33]. Each presentation of an auditory event was followed by a rest period (15.5 s) for the cerebral blood flow induced by the event to return to baseline.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Maternal vocalization occurring within 3 seconds of the onset of infant behavior was considered to be a contingent response (Lewis & Goldberg, 1969). This 3-second interval is regarded as within young infants’ short-term memory for contingency perception (Lewis & Goldberg, 1969; Reeve, Reeve, & Poulson, 1993; Watson, 1985; 2001). The measure of maternal contingency was the proportion of infant vocalizations responded to by the mother within 3 seconds of their occurrence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, there exists credible evidence that the functions relating response-consequence delay and behavior change under operant and feedback procedures are similar and, therefore, attributable to common behavioral processes. Correspondingly, similar procedures may be used to mitigate the effects of responseconsequence delay for both feedback and reinforcement or punishment preparations (see, for example, Dickinson et al 1996;Lurie and Swaminathan 2009;Metcalfe et al 2009;Reeve et al 1993;Stromer et al 2000).…”
Section: Delay Of Consequences For Respondingmentioning
confidence: 99%