2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.05.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parametric study on the evaluation of ductility demand distribution in multi-degree-of-freedom systems considering soil–structure interaction effects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The other parameters, having less importance, may be set to some typical values for conventional buildings [19,27,30]. The third one controls the inelastic behavior of the structure.…”
Section: Key Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other parameters, having less importance, may be set to some typical values for conventional buildings [19,27,30]. The third one controls the inelastic behavior of the structure.…”
Section: Key Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study by Ganjavi and Hao [27] indicates that using codespecified load pattern for soil-structure systems with severe SSI effect and high inelastic response does not lead to uniform (optimal) ductility demand distribution over the height of structures. A recent study by Ganjavi and Hao [27] indicates that using codespecified load pattern for soil-structure systems with severe SSI effect and high inelastic response does not lead to uniform (optimal) ductility demand distribution over the height of structures.…”
Section: Optimization Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The kinematic interaction effect is not included assuming that the rigid foundation lies on the surface of the soil with no embedment. To model the frequency-dependent rotational spring and dashpot coefficients, an additional internal rotational degree of freedom, θ, is assigned to a polar mass moment of inertia, m  , and connected to the foundation mass with a zero-length element using a rotational dashpot [27][28][29]. Moreover, to modify the effect of soil incompressibility, an additional mass moment of inertia M   is added to the foundation when  is greater than 1/3 [34].…”
Section: Soil Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared to fixed-base systems, soil-structure systems possess longer periods and generally higher damping ratios due to the energy dissipation provided by hysteretic behaviour and wave radiation in the soil medium. Ganjavi and Hao [28] investigated the adequacy of IBC-2009 lateral loading patterns for seismic design of elastic and inelastic soil-structure systems through analyses of 7200 shear-buildings with SSI effects subjected to a group of 30 earthquakes recorded on alluvium and soft soils. They concluded that using the code-specified design load patterns leads to nearly uniform ductility demand distributions for structures having short periods and within the elastic range of response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many codes (such as Mexico's Federal District Code MFDC-04 [1] and ASCE/SEI 7-05 [2]), the lateral load patterns along the height of building depend on the fundamental period and their masses (Ganjavi and Hao [3]). In these codes, the load pattern is obtained by elastic analysis under a fixed-base condition, neglecting the possible effects of soil-foundation flexibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%