1988
DOI: 10.1109/10.7271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parametric method of identification of single-trial event-related potentials in the brain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Epochs with bilateral EMG activity were also discarded. Eye-movement related artifacts were corrected using an Auto-Regressive Exogenous input (ARX) model, in which the vertical and horizontal EOG signals were used as the exogenous inputs (Cerutti et al 1988). Approximately 150 artifact-free epochs for each side in each subject were obtained.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epochs with bilateral EMG activity were also discarded. Eye-movement related artifacts were corrected using an Auto-Regressive Exogenous input (ARX) model, in which the vertical and horizontal EOG signals were used as the exogenous inputs (Cerutti et al 1988). Approximately 150 artifact-free epochs for each side in each subject were obtained.…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the indubitable ability of the identification procedure to extract the EP or ER content from the single-sweep raw data has been widely demonstrated in the literature, also by the authors. In fact, it has been successfully applied to MRBM (10,11,12,25), evoked magnetoencephalogram (21), visual evoked potentials (VEP) (23), somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) (24), and contemporary visual and somatosensory stimulation, together with VEP-SEP recordings (11,22). As already stated, the final goal of the present paper concerns the applicability of the ARX to SCD brain mapping and our results suggest which is the better order of application of the Laplacian and ARX procedures to the raw data in order to get a reliable and more easily readable single-sweep brain map.…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…2, the activation areas do not suffer the same fragmentation due to the noise superimposed to MRBM signals. In fact, both methods remove smear effects of volume conduction and better define the activation sites (10).…”
Section: Results and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The spatially and temporally nonstationary components of event-related potentials can be diminished or masked completely by conventional averaging techniques used to enhance the signal-to-noise ratio of the signal (2)(3)(4). Therefore, the topographical analysis of EEG activity can require an accurate preliminary single trial evaluation, which is time-consuming.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%