2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actaastro.2018.04.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parametric analysis of a controlled deployable space manipulator for capturing a non-cooperative flexible satellite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FIGURES 15, 18, 21 depict the time histories of the relative velocity of the Tip 1 and Tip 3 of the end-effector to the closest points on the target satellite. FIGURES 16,19,22 plot the time histories of the close angle of the end-effector. As could be seen in FIGURES 14,15,17,18,20,21, there are oscillations in all of the distance and relative velocity curves in the initial stage of three simulations.…”
Section: A Effectiveness Evaluation Of the Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…FIGURES 15, 18, 21 depict the time histories of the relative velocity of the Tip 1 and Tip 3 of the end-effector to the closest points on the target satellite. FIGURES 16,19,22 plot the time histories of the close angle of the end-effector. As could be seen in FIGURES 14,15,17,18,20,21, there are oscillations in all of the distance and relative velocity curves in the initial stage of three simulations.…”
Section: A Effectiveness Evaluation Of the Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, the impedance control was employed to realize the soft contact in the normal direction of a non-cooperative satellite surface, while the position control was utilized to maintain the end-tip position and orientation at the same contact point. In [18], [19], the compliant wrist was also added to the end-effector and the impedance control method has been adopted for contact control. Unlike [15], the compliant wrist was employed only to prolong the contact duration when the space robot collides with the target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to absorb the impact energy and make the contact process behave like a spring-damper system, the end-effector structure is designed as shown in Figure 2 . This end-effector is mainly composed of a prismatic joint, a contact plane, an axis spring, and a torsional spring, which is connected with the last joint of the manipulator [ 35 ]. Note that there is no active control unit in the end-effector.…”
Section: Space Manipulator Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is impossible to transport it to space as a whole or install such a large space system manually in space. Large space structure construction through on-orbit services (OOS) may be the best solution [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. OOS missions also include visual inspection, fuel refueling and satellite repair and are of increasing interest to the space industry because of their high economical potential and strategic benefits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many interesting challenges in the development and operation of space robots for OOS missions, such as motion estimation and the prediction of target objects, multi-physics modeling and the simulation of space manipulators, practical dynamic parameter identification, dexterous and efficient manipulation, time delay and sensor errors in feedback controls, compliance and intelligent controls, multi-arm coordinated controls and operations, among others [5][6][7]. A visual servo is also an important technology for manipulators for OOS missions [8][9][10][11][12][13]. It uses the image information captured by a camera to position or track space manipulators.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%