2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.conengprac.2012.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parameter-varying filtered PID strategy for air–fuel ratio control of spark ignition engines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consider the internal dynamics of the AFR system with the known upper bound of (11). Applying (10) to internal dynamics of the AFR system with disturbances and time-varying delay (5) gives a finite time in which to reach the sliding surface (7) such that:…”
Section: Stability Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Consider the internal dynamics of the AFR system with the known upper bound of (11). Applying (10) to internal dynamics of the AFR system with disturbances and time-varying delay (5) gives a finite time in which to reach the sliding surface (7) such that:…”
Section: Stability Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, an adaptive and model-predictive controller for SI engine AFR control was proposed by Kenneth et al [9], who estimated the model and disturbance states of the system by a Kalman filter. Recently, Ebrahimi et al [10,11] proposed a second-order sliding mode and a parameter-varying filtered PID strategy for AFR control of SI engines. These methods can remove the effects of time-varying delay, canister purge disturbance, and measurement noise.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To challenge the air-fuel ratio control problem, various research works have been reported in the past, such as PID control (Ebrahimi et al, 2012), sliding model control (Pace and Zhu, 2009), feed-forward controller with a purge event fueling system using a transport delay model (Zamanian et al, 2015), neural network feed-forward-feedback control (Zhai and Yu, 2008), linear quadratic (LQ) control (Pace and Zhu, 2014) and model based predictive control (MPC) (Wong et al, 2014). In recent, the generalized predictive controller (GPC) is widely in use due to the advantage covering the area of multi-variable, time-varying and delay in engine system with considering the assumptions of better accuracy in model prediction and optimizer efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the AFR control problem for SI engines, the most popular approach is proportional-integral (PI) control together with an open-loop feedforward control element, based on lookup tables [6]. However, the compilation of the lookup tables is time-consuming as it requires significant calibration and tuning phases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%