2018
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2865124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Parameter Division Based Method for the Geometrical Calibration of X-Ray Industrial Cone-Beam CT

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The input of the algorithm for generating sinograms based on expressions (3)-( 8) receives an ideal sinogram. This sinogram for the test object, consisting of a finite number of fragments with different densities, is described by expression (11). For a detailed implementation of the algorithm being carried out for specific shapes of fragments of sections of the test object, for example, circles and squares, see ( 12)- (17).…”
Section: Formation Of Real Sinograms and Their Graphic Displaymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The input of the algorithm for generating sinograms based on expressions (3)-( 8) receives an ideal sinogram. This sinogram for the test object, consisting of a finite number of fragments with different densities, is described by expression (11). For a detailed implementation of the algorithm being carried out for specific shapes of fragments of sections of the test object, for example, circles and squares, see ( 12)- (17).…”
Section: Formation Of Real Sinograms and Their Graphic Displaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5][6][7][8]. The tasks of designing computed tomography systems are determined by consumer interests [9][10][11]. The relevant information is divided into two groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The online method directly recovers unknown geometric parameters from projections of the imaged object. Researchers usually exploit the symmetrical properties of the mirrored projection [6] or sinogram [7] and consistency of different projections on the same virtual plane [8]. Jailin et al [9] further uses reprojection of a reconstructed 3D image close to the initial projection to recover the unknown geometric parameters.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, calibration methods can be categorized into two groups: online self-calibration and offline phantom calibration. Online methods perform calibration depending on the projection data [5][6][7][8] or reconstructed image of an object [9][10][11][12], while offline methods [13][14][15][16][17][18] leverage one view or multi-view projections of a specific calibration phantom. Online methods do not require a separate scan of a dedicated phantom, but the need for reconstruction images in some calibration methods increases the high computation burden.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature there are various methods described for reference-based and reference-less (off-line and on-line) misalignment compensation for cone-beam CT; see e.g. [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%