2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0305-0548(01)00026-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parallel genetic algorithm to solve the set-covering problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of the Mean Space Covered for the mentioned DAGs with 8 processors (P = 8) (Figure 6)‚ the PGAs decrease their exploration in the measure that the degree of parallelism increases confirming the results shown in [13]. For their part the PTS show a similar performance‚ although for Mean Space Covered always less‚ and a slower decrease in the measure that the degree of parallelism increases.…”
Section: 1supporting
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In terms of the Mean Space Covered for the mentioned DAGs with 8 processors (P = 8) (Figure 6)‚ the PGAs decrease their exploration in the measure that the degree of parallelism increases confirming the results shown in [13]. For their part the PTS show a similar performance‚ although for Mean Space Covered always less‚ and a slower decrease in the measure that the degree of parallelism increases.…”
Section: 1supporting
confidence: 74%
“…This parallel model uses K processes executed independently, and with independent information. The best result is communicated to a master process which determines the best solution and communicates this to the concurrent processes [13].…”
Section: Synchronous Network Concurrency Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The initial D s and the cooling ratio µ were set to 0.6 and 0.99. The results were shown in Table 7 where the results produced by the parallel GA (PGA) (Solar et al 2002) and the standard GA (SGA) (Caldas and Norford 2002) were also listed for comparison. In the table, P s is the population size, the "error%" column corresponds to the average percentage error of (8) where Solution(i) is the solution found in the i# run, Optimal is the optimal solution (shown in Table 6) of problem.…”
Section: Simulation Results On the Scpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this approach actual solutions are found by an external decoder function, results can be further improved by adding another indirect optimization layer and then optimized by another hillclimbing algorithm. A parallel genetic algorithm (PGA) model to solve the set-covering problem is presented in Solar et al (2002). An experimental study obtained with a binary representation of the SCP, shows that PGA performs better than the sequential model in terms of the number of generations (computational time) needed to achieve solutions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%