37th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit 1999
DOI: 10.2514/6.1999-789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A parallel, finite-volume algorithm for large-eddy simulation of turbulent flows

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
27
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar techniques have also been successfully explored by Bui [6], Mary and Sagaut [16] and Ciardi et al [7].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Similar techniques have also been successfully explored by Bui [6], Mary and Sagaut [16] and Ciardi et al [7].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Therefore, in order to make the model less diffusive, the upwinding term needs to be reduced as much as possible, while the stability is kept. This can be achieved [28] by using an upwinding coefficient c d , so that expression (15) becomes…”
Section: Reduction Of the Numerical Viscositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the large eddy simulation model described by Bui [28], smaller values (0.03-0.05) were needed to obtain good results. Diminishing the c d value increases the computational cost because the minimum value of this coefficient necessary for stability decreases with the mesh size [28]; that is to say, to diminish the c d acceptable values, finer grids have to be used. After a trial-and-error process, the most appropriate value was found to be c d = 0.03, with the 81×81 nodes mesh.…”
Section: Reduction Of the Numerical Viscositymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have shown their superior performance, compared to artificial viscosity schemes [34]. Unfortunately, upwind schemes are frequently associated to an excessive numerical dissipation in more general flows [13], [14], [15], being rather widely regarded as "specialized" methods, and not well suited for more general flows [34].…”
Section: Upwind Schemes: High-order Reconstructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various researchers have reported that first and even second order upwind schemes exhibit excessive numerical dissipation when applied to more general flows (not necessarily including shock wave propagation) where turbulent effects are of interest [13], [14], [15], and several corrections to the original algorithms have been proposed in order to reduce the unnecessary artificial dissipation introduced in the computations. Unfortunately, these corrections are somewhat "heuristic", and yet remains a compromise between accuracy and stability: the lesser the dissipation added the more accurate the results, whereas some amount of artificial viscosity is unavoidably necessary to yield stable algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%