2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10915-021-01598-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Parallel Dynamic Asynchronous Framework for Uncertainty Quantification by Hierarchical Monte Carlo Algorithms

Abstract: The necessity of dealing with uncertainties is growing in many different fields of science and engineering. Due to the constant development of computational capabilities, current solvers must satisfy both statistical accuracy and computational efficiency. The aim of this work is to introduce an asynchronous framework for Monte Carlo and Multilevel Monte Carlo methods to achieve such a result. The proposed approach presents the same reliability of state of the art techniques, and aims at improving the computati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A critical paradigm to support was the relaxation of global synchronizations required between simulations belonging to different levels of the MLMC algorithm. 12 In addition, the support for MPI tasks was very naive at that time and required extensions to support more complex data layouts.…”
Section: Exaqute Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A critical paradigm to support was the relaxation of global synchronizations required between simulations belonging to different levels of the MLMC algorithm. 12 In addition, the support for MPI tasks was very naive at that time and required extensions to support more complex data layouts.…”
Section: Exaqute Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The computational efficiency of the joint use of XMC, Kratos and PyCOMPSs has already been demonstrated, and optimal strong scalability was ensured up to 128 nodes (6144 central processing units (CPUs)) (Tosi et al, 2021a).…”
Section: Numerical Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%