1995
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.92.5.1719
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A paradoxical regulation of the dopamine D3 receptor expression suggests the involvement of an anterograde factor from dopamine neurons.

Abstract: The effects of interruption of dopaminergic transmission or sustained blockade of dopamine receptors by neuroleptics on the dopamine D3 receptor in the shell of the nucleus accumbens were investigated in rats. In this brain area the D3 receptor is abundant and may mediate antipsychotic drug effects. The D3 receptor density and mRNA abundance were evaluated with 7-[3H]hydroxy-N,N-di-n-propyl-2-aminotetralin and by quantitative PCR or image analysis ofin situ hybridization signals, respectively. Unilateral dopam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

14
81
3

Year Published

1996
1996
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 155 publications
(98 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
14
81
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Neither D 2 nor D 3 receptor upregulation was detected in CPu or ACC after long-term treatment with clozapine or (ϩ)-NPA, and fluphenazine evidently increased D 2 but not D 3 binding (Tables 4 and 5 (Table 5), consistent with previous findings after antipsychotic treatment (Levésque et al 1995;). Lack of a response of D 3 receptors to repeated treatment with DA antagonists may reflect their inability to upregulate in response to prolonged blockade, perhaps paralleling their limited or inconsistent interactions with G-proteins and second- (Sokoloff et al 1990;Baldessarini and Tarazi 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Neither D 2 nor D 3 receptor upregulation was detected in CPu or ACC after long-term treatment with clozapine or (ϩ)-NPA, and fluphenazine evidently increased D 2 but not D 3 binding (Tables 4 and 5 (Table 5), consistent with previous findings after antipsychotic treatment (Levésque et al 1995;). Lack of a response of D 3 receptors to repeated treatment with DA antagonists may reflect their inability to upregulate in response to prolonged blockade, perhaps paralleling their limited or inconsistent interactions with G-proteins and second- (Sokoloff et al 1990;Baldessarini and Tarazi 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Murray et al 1994). Studies in the rat indicate D 3 receptors may be regulated by loss of DA afferents differently from the D 2 receptor and produce a reduction in number (Lévesque et al 1995). We have recently demonstrated that striatal DA loss in PD also alters D 3 receptors in a manner opposing that of D 2 receptors and, thus, make it difficult to differentiate between these effects in this study (Ryoo et al 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Thus, brain areas with relatively high densities of D 3 receptors may be under tonic regulatory influence of the brain dopaminergic system, even if the dopaminergic innervation is sparse. D 2 and D 3 receptors may elicit opposing responses in neurons Lévesque et al 1995;Surmeier et al 1996), and may respond differently to loss of DA or antipsychotic treatment (reviewed in Joyce and Meador-Woodruff 1997). Our data provide initial insight into details of distribution and co-expression of DA D 2 and D 3 receptors in the human brain.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%