2015
DOI: 10.1080/21655979.2014.1004019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A paradigm shift in biomass technology from complete to partial cellulose hydrolysis: lessons learned from nature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(27 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…with several sugar transporters (CDT-1 from N. crassa and Lac12 from Kluyveromyces lactis, etc. )have been introduced into S. cerevisiae for successful ethanol production from cellobiose [1,2,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Whereas the hydrolytic pathway is known to spend 2 ATP molecules to initiate glycolysis with cellobiose (cellobiose + H 2 O + 2 ATP → 2 glucose-6-phosphate + 2 ADP), the phosphorolytic pathway is known to have energetic advantages with the expense of only 1 ATP molecule (cellobiose + phosphate + ATP → 2 glucose-6-phosphate + ADP), suggesting that the phosphorolytic pathway would provide several benefits (e.g., higher cell growth yield and higher ethanol yield by saving energy) compared with the hydrolytic pathway under anaerobic and stressful conditions [9,13,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…with several sugar transporters (CDT-1 from N. crassa and Lac12 from Kluyveromyces lactis, etc. )have been introduced into S. cerevisiae for successful ethanol production from cellobiose [1,2,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Whereas the hydrolytic pathway is known to spend 2 ATP molecules to initiate glycolysis with cellobiose (cellobiose + H 2 O + 2 ATP → 2 glucose-6-phosphate + 2 ADP), the phosphorolytic pathway is known to have energetic advantages with the expense of only 1 ATP molecule (cellobiose + phosphate + ATP → 2 glucose-6-phosphate + ADP), suggesting that the phosphorolytic pathway would provide several benefits (e.g., higher cell growth yield and higher ethanol yield by saving energy) compared with the hydrolytic pathway under anaerobic and stressful conditions [9,13,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…d ‐cellobiose is a disaccharide composed of two β‐glucose monomers linked by a β(1 → 4) bond. It is a by‐product of cellulose saccharification with standard commercial mixtures of cellulases but becomes a predominant product when β‐glucosidase is omitted from the cocktail (Chen, 2015). Well‐defined microbial hosts capable of efficient cellobiose utilization are therefore desirable because they can be applied in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose for production of VAC while the process cost is reduced as addition of expensive β‐glucosidase is not needed (Ha et al , 2011; Chen, 2015; Parisutham et al , 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…D-cellobiose is a disaccharide composed of two β-glucose monomers linked by a β(1→4) bond. It is a by-product of cellulose saccharification with standard commercial mixtures of cellulases but becomes a predominant product when β-glucosidase is omitted from the cocktail (Chen, 2015). Well-defined microbial hosts capable of efficient cellobiose utilisation are therefore desirable because they can be applied in simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of cellulose for production of VAC while the process cost is reduced as addition of expensive β-glucosidase is not needed (Ha et al , 2011; Chen, 2015; Parisutham et al , 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%