Knowledge and Social Capital 2000
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-7506-7222-1.50007-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Paradigm for Social Capital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
86
0
5

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
86
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In economic sociology, there are two general theories for understanding how social relations and networks create economic and social benefits. The weak-tie approach argues that a large, nonredundant network of arm's-length ties is most advantageous; the strong-tie approach argues that a closed, tightly knit network of embedded ties is most advantageous (Sandefur and Laumann 1998). How can these opposing approaches to tie quality (weak versus strong) and network structure ("holely" versus dense) be reconciled?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In economic sociology, there are two general theories for understanding how social relations and networks create economic and social benefits. The weak-tie approach argues that a large, nonredundant network of arm's-length ties is most advantageous; the strong-tie approach argues that a closed, tightly knit network of embedded ties is most advantageous (Sandefur and Laumann 1998). How can these opposing approaches to tie quality (weak versus strong) and network structure ("holely" versus dense) be reconciled?…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the perspective of TF-MA, the benefits that social capital can provide include information and influence (Samdefir & Laumann 1988). For instance, effective information improves the efficiency of customs and border clearance.…”
Section: Trade Costmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sandefur and Laumann (1998) claim that in most empirical analyses that examine the effects of social capital on outcomes of interest, the concept has been modeled as either present or absent. The dichotomization of social capital (and presumably of cultural capital as well) promotes deficit thinking (Rios-Aguilar and Deil-Amen, 2011).…”
Section: Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%