2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-9473(02)00263-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pairwise likelihood approach to estimation in multilevel probit models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
76
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
76
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A composite likelihood is constructed by low-dimensional likelihood objects defined over small subsets of data. This dimension reduction methodology on the likelihood function has been successfully applied in many areas, including for example, generalized linear mixed models (Renard et al, 2004), genetics (Fearnhead & Donnelly, 2002), spatial statistics (Hjort & Omre, 1994;Heagerty & Lele, 1998;Varin & Vidoni, 2005) and multivariate survival analysis (Parner, 2001 andLin, 2006). It has demonstrated to possess desirable theoretical properties, such as estimation consistency and asymptotic normality, and can be utilized to establish hypothesis testing procedures in a similar fashion to the classical likelihood ratio test; see a recent review paper by Varin (2008) and more references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A composite likelihood is constructed by low-dimensional likelihood objects defined over small subsets of data. This dimension reduction methodology on the likelihood function has been successfully applied in many areas, including for example, generalized linear mixed models (Renard et al, 2004), genetics (Fearnhead & Donnelly, 2002), spatial statistics (Hjort & Omre, 1994;Heagerty & Lele, 1998;Varin & Vidoni, 2005) and multivariate survival analysis (Parner, 2001 andLin, 2006). It has demonstrated to possess desirable theoretical properties, such as estimation consistency and asymptotic normality, and can be utilized to establish hypothesis testing procedures in a similar fashion to the classical likelihood ratio test; see a recent review paper by Varin (2008) and more references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pairwise likelihood inference is much simpler than using the full likelihood since it involves only bivariate normal integrals. For instance (see also Renard et al, 2004), we have pr…”
Section: Binary Datamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…To our knowledge, no earlier study in the literature has considered the CML method in the context of unorderedresponse models (rather, all earlier studies have used the CML approach for multivariate models such as the multivariate binary probit or the multivariate ordered probit (see, for example, Renard et al, 2004, Zhao and Joe, 2005, Varin and Vidoni, 2006, Feddag and Bacci, 2009, Bhat and Sener, 2009, Varin and Czado, 2010, Bhat et al, 2010a. This is because the CML method by itself is not well suited to unordered-response models and does not provide substantial computational benefits in unordered-response models; rather, it is our specific proposal in this paper to combine the CML method with the normal orthant probability approximation method of the previous section that is the key to computational benefits.…”
Section: The Composite Marginal Likelihood (Cml) Estimatormentioning
confidence: 99%