2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1910.02691
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A pair degree condition for Hamiltonian cycles in $3$-uniform hypergraphs

Abstract: We prove a new sufficient pair-degree condition for Hamiltonian cycles in 3uniform hypergraphs that asymptotically improves the best known pair-degree condition due to Rödl, Ruciński, and Szemerédi. For graphs, Chvátal improved on Dirac's tight condition on the minimum degree of a graph ensuring a Hamiltonian cycle by characterising all degree sequences that guarantee the existence of a Hamiltonian cycle. A step towards Chvátal's theorem was taken by Pósa who showed that a graph on at least 3 vertices whose de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(28 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, it is natural to ask whether these type of results generalise to hypergraphs. On the practical side, first steps in this direction were undertaken by Schülke [67] for tight cycles under codegree sequence conditions in 3-uniform hypergraphs and by and Bowtell and Hyde [9] for perfect matchings under minimum vertex degree conditions in 3-uniform graphs. On the theoretical side, Hamilton frameworks minimum degree conditions for tight Hamilton cycles have been proposed in our earlier work [53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it is natural to ask whether these type of results generalise to hypergraphs. On the practical side, first steps in this direction were undertaken by Schülke [67] for tight cycles under codegree sequence conditions in 3-uniform hypergraphs and by and Bowtell and Hyde [9] for perfect matchings under minimum vertex degree conditions in 3-uniform graphs. On the theoretical side, Hamilton frameworks minimum degree conditions for tight Hamilton cycles have been proposed in our earlier work [53].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is natural to consider what degree sequence results may be obtained which improve on known minimum degree thresholds for perfect matchings and other spanning structures, such as Hamiltonian cycles, and tilings of subgraphs other than K k k , in any k-graphs, not just for k = 3. Schulke [21] asks about vertex degree sequences that guarantee the existence of a Hamilton cycle in a 3-graph. Though the existence of a perfect matching does not imply the existence of a Hamilton cycle, our extremal examples containing no perfect matchings do clearly imply degree sequences for which a Hamilton cycle is not guaranteed.…”
Section: Concluding Discussion and Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, for n ∈ N and a 3-graph H = ([n], E) we define d(i, j) to be the number of edges of H containing both vertex i and vertex j. Generalising a result of Rödl, Ruciński and Szemerédi [20] on the asymptotic minimum co-degree threshold for a tight Hamilton cycle in a 3-graph, Schulke [21] proved the following: Theorem 1.2. For all γ > 0, there exists an n 0 ∈ N such that for n ≥ n 0 the following holds: If…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The oldest variant are Berge cycles [3], whose minimum degree conditions were studied by Bermond, Germa, Heydemann and Sotteau [4]. In the last two decades, however, research has increasingly focused on a stricter notion of Hamilton cycles [1,14,18,30,31,33,[37][38][39]43] introduced by Kierstead and Katona [22]. A tight cycle in 𝑘-graph is a cyclically ordered set of at least 𝑘 + 1 vertices such that every interval of 𝑘 subsequent vertices forms an edge.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%