2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.lithos.2013.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A P–T–t–D discontinuity in east-central Nepal: Implications for the evolution of the Himalayan mid-crust

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

17
128
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(145 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
17
128
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other studies have recorded monazite ages decreasing with depth below major thrust zones, both in the MCT zone, where monazite ages generally span between ∼21 and 11 Ma throughout the central to eastern Himalaya (Bollinger and Janots, 2006;Catlos et al, 2004Catlos et al, , 2001Harrison et al, 1997;Kohn et al, 2001;Larson and Cottle, 2014;Larson et al, 2013;McQuarrie et al, 2014), and the Canadian Cordillera (Crowley and Parrish, 1999;Gibson et al, 1999). Monazite ages collected from this study are therefore in agreement with the age range yielded from previous studies.…”
Section: Metamorphic Evolution Of the Mct Zonesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Other studies have recorded monazite ages decreasing with depth below major thrust zones, both in the MCT zone, where monazite ages generally span between ∼21 and 11 Ma throughout the central to eastern Himalaya (Bollinger and Janots, 2006;Catlos et al, 2004Catlos et al, , 2001Harrison et al, 1997;Kohn et al, 2001;Larson and Cottle, 2014;Larson et al, 2013;McQuarrie et al, 2014), and the Canadian Cordillera (Crowley and Parrish, 1999;Gibson et al, 1999). Monazite ages collected from this study are therefore in agreement with the age range yielded from previous studies.…”
Section: Metamorphic Evolution Of the Mct Zonesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…c. 22-15 Ma in Larson et al, 2013;17-13 Ma in Montomoli et al, 2013). This means that kyanite in the MCT zone grew at different times.…”
Section: Tectonic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Carosi et al, 2007Carosi et al, , 2010Corrie and Kohn, 2011;Imayama et al, 2012;Larson et al, 2013;Montomoli et al, 2013;see Montomoli et al, 2014 for a review) have shown that the GHS has a much more complex crustal architecture compared to simple models where a single coherent tectonic unit is bounded by only two tectonic discontinuities with opposite sense of shear. These recent findings are also compatible with diachronic melting within the GHS (Corrie and Kohn, 2011;Imayama et al, 2012;Kohn et al, 2005;Rubatto et al, 2013).…”
Section: Tectonic Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While previous studies have focused on orogen-scale compatibility between deformational processes occurring within the midcrust in the deep orogenic hinterland and those processes occurring at higher structural levels in the orogenic shallower foreland (e.g., Price, 1972;Simony and Carr, 2011), more recent studies have documented similar kinematic compatibility at much smaller scales (e.g., Larson et al, 2010Larson et al, , 2011Larson et al, , 2013Yakymchuck and Godin, 2012). These types of studies, which integrate structural, metamorphic, and geochronologic data, provide a means by which to characterize the potentially distinct geologic histories of spatially adjacent rocks that may have evolved uniquely in initially separate regions of an orogen.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been much debate over which of the "end-member" models proposed for the evolution of the Himalaya, commonly considered to be wedge-taper processes or channel flow, best describes or explains available geologic data (see Beaumont and Jamieson, 2010;Larson et al, 2013). However, thermo-mechanical orogenic simulations (e.g., Jamieson et al, 2004) implicitly predict a change from lateral midcrustal flow in the orogenic hinterland to wedge-taper processes in the foreland of the orogen (Beaumont and Jamieson, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%