2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A one-step multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for rapid and simultaneous detection of human norovirus genogroup I, II and IV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection limit of the assays using Noprobe3 and Noprobe4 was similar to previous established assays at a range of 10100 copies per reaction (16,17). With such high sensitivity, our assays cannot only be applied for clinical samples in which high copy numbers of viruses are present but also for detection of environmental and food samples where the virus is present at low copy numbers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The detection limit of the assays using Noprobe3 and Noprobe4 was similar to previous established assays at a range of 10100 copies per reaction (16,17). With such high sensitivity, our assays cannot only be applied for clinical samples in which high copy numbers of viruses are present but also for detection of environmental and food samples where the virus is present at low copy numbers.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This is the first report to describe a Luminex-based laboratory-developed assay designed specifically in order to include MERS-CoV as one of targets. Several commercial Luminex-based kits for respiratory viruses are available now, such as xTAG ™ respiratory virus panel (RVP) and xTAG ™ RVP Fast (Luminex Corp.), MultiCode ® -PLx (EraGen Biosciences), ResPlex II Kit (QIAGEN) [26,32,33], however , they either involve too complicated steps, or include too many Over the past ten years, 'in-house' real-time PCR/ RT-PCR assays have been used by our lab for the diagnosis and surveillance of viral respiratory tract illnesses and showed the good characteristics of rapid and simplicity due to the advantage of simultaneous amplification and analysis, without post-amplification manipulation [34,35]. However, the primers and probes provided by provincial CDC and state CDC were designed specifically for individual target, so these 'in-house' assays for lab diagnosis were mostly monoplex.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the primers and probes provided by provincial CDC and state CDC were designed specifically for individual target, so these 'in-house' assays for lab diagnosis were mostly monoplex. Although multiplex real-time RT-PCR was also used in work, the limited multiplexing and throughput capacity became its obvious shortcomings due to the limited fluorescent channels in a real-time instrument and the adverse interactions between primers and probes in one reaction [20,35]. So, a multiplex real-time RT-PCR assay for more targets has to be divided into two or more panels, such as our developed real-time RT-PCR assay with two panels for six respiratory viruses in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recently described duplex assay had no loss of sensitivity compared to the sensitivities of GI and GII monoplex assays, and when applied to surface water and groundwater samples, this assay was more efficient that conventional RT-PCR (60). Only one other study targeting all three human NoV genogroups in a multiplex assay based on GI and GII primers/probes and newly designed primers and probe for GIV has been described previously (18,61). As noted by these authors, the sensitivity of the multiplex realtime assay that was developed was lower than the sensitivities of the corresponding monoplex assays due to interactions of primers and probes, confirmed by the failure of NoV detection in three of seven food or environmental samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%