A nurse‐led education and cognitive behaviour therapy‐based intervention among adults with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: A randomised controlled trial

Whitehead, Lisa; Crowe, Marie; Carter, Janet D.; Maskill, Virginia; Carlyle, Dave; Bugge, Carol; Frampton, Chris

doi:10.1111/jep.12725

Cited by 41 publications

(87 citation statements)

References 23 publications

(36 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Nine (2.2%) RCTs [ 21 – 29 ] confirmed inclusion of people with SMI following email requests; however, of these, only six [ 21 – 23 , 25 , 28 , 29 ] provided data on the numbers recruited and none provided data on effectiveness of the interventions in their participants with SMI. The six trials that provided data recruited a total of 1009 participants with T2DM, of whom 31 (3.1%) had SMI.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The six trials that provided data on participants with SMI were conducted in Brazil [ 23 ], New Zealand [ 28 ], Qatar [ 22 ], Slovenia [ 29 ] and the United States [ 21 , 25 ]. The interventions they evaluated were varied.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The second [ 25 ] compared self-study, individual and group versions of DECIDE and recruited eight people with SMI, six with schizophrenia, one with bipolar disorder and one who had depression with psychotic features. Whitehead et al 2017 [ 28 ] recruited one person with SMI (personality disorder) to their comparison of nurse-led education plus Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) with nurse-led education alone or usual care. Two different levels of intensity of multidisciplinary care plus education were compared in a trial [ 23 ] that recruited four participants with SMI - one with bipolar disorder, two who had depression with psychotic features and one with personality disorder.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Are diabetes self-management programmes for the general diabetes population effective for people with severe mental illness?: a systematic review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Diabetes self-management education programmes are effective in improving health outcomes in the general population with diabetes. However, it is not known if these programmes include people who also have a severe mental illness (SMI) and, if so, what their outcomes are. The aim of this review was to examine if evaluations of diabetes self-management education programmes included people with SMI, and if so, whether the interventions were beneficial for this population. Methods The inclusion criteria for this systematic review, defined by PICOS criteria, were: Population - Adults with type 2 diabetes; Intervention - self-management education programme; Comparator – another active intervention or usual care; Outcomes of interest – inclusion of people with SMI and the clinical, behavioural and psychosocial outcomes in this population; Study design - randomised controlled trials. The following bibliographic databases were searched from January 2004 to April 2018: Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Allied and Complimentary Medicine Database, Health Technology Assessment, NHS Economic Evaluations Database and CINAHL. Data were extracted on study characteristics, inclusion and exclusion criteria, participant and intervention characteristics, number of participants with SMI, and outcomes for people with SMI, if reported. Authors were contacted by email for missing data. Results A total of 410 trials were included. At least 42% of trials did not recruit any participants with SMI. Only nine confirmed inclusion of participants with SMI, of which six provided data on the number recruited. These six trials recruited a total of 1009 participants, of whom 31 (3.1%) had SMI. It was not possible to assess intervention effectiveness for people with SMI as none of the trials reported outcomes for these participants. Conclusions This systematic review confirms that people with SMI are often excluded from trials of diabetes self-management education, resulting in a lack of an evidence base on which to base treatment paths for this vulnerable population. It cannot be assumed that programmes developed for the general diabetes population meet the needs of people with SMI. Future research needs to examine if and how these programmes could be adapted for people with SMI or if new programmes are required.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Are diabetes self-management programmes for the general diabetes population effective for people with severe mental illness?: a systematic review

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…32 A wealth of data support the importance of nurses in patient and caregiver education. Research has found that nurse-led education can support overall patient and caregiver well-being, 33 activation, 34,35 and knowledge retention. 34 Nurses also play a role in coaching patients and caregivers through self-care and instructions on disease management, 36,37 areas that the present study identified as distinct needs of patients to drive patient experience.…”

Section: Expertise Patients Perceiving They Are Being Cared For Bymentioning

confidence: 99%

Creation of a Patient-Centered Journey Map to Improve the Patient Experience: A Mixed Methods Approach

Philpot

Khokhar

DeZutter

et al. 2019

Mayo Clinic Proceedings: Innovations, Quality & Outcomes

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3 , 4 Key to the management of diabetes according to the American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 5 is glycemic control, and this underpins the prevention of acute and long-term complications. Maintaining glycemic control through a combination of medication and/or lifestyle remains challenging for many people living with type 2 diabetes 6 and linked to long-term complications. 7 , 8 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

<p>Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Reliability of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) for Arabic Speaking Patients with Type II Diabetes</p>

Arabiat¹,

Whitehead²,

Sheikh³

et al. 2020

JMDH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Treatment satisfaction is an important indicator for treatment compliance and glycemic control. Although psychometric properties of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire have been confirmed in several languages, it remains unclear the extent to which the factorial structure of this tool is valid for Arabic speaking populations. Purpose: This study set out to confirm the construct validity of the Arabic version of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) by investigating the fit of published factor structures and the reliability of responses in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes. Methods: Data were from a large cross-sectional study of 1002 patients with diabetes in Jordan. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to compare three different models of the 8-item questionnaire (one factor, two factors, three factors) across patients treated with insulin and patients treated with oral hypoglycaemic medications. Results: Statistics covered the factorial validity and omega reliability coefficient (Ω w) of the DTSQ. We were able to replicate the three different models of the 8-item Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire reported in previous studies, yet a two-factor model provided the best fit to the data in our sample with omega reliability coefficient (Ω w) of the subscales above 0.70. Conclusion: The finding suggests a cross-cultural invariance of the factor structure of the Arabic version of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire, as we were able to replicate the same factor structure using the Arabic translated version of the tool and using non-English speaking participants. Within known limitations and gaps in the literature, healthcare professionals working with Arabic speaking patients may find this tool useful for identification of high-risk patients and those in need for interventions to promote glycemic control.

show abstract

A nurse‐led education and cognitive behaviour therapy‐based intervention among adults with uncontrolled type 2 diabetes: A randomised controlled trial

Abstract: At 6 months post intervention, HbA was reduced in both intervention groups with a greater reduction noted in the nurse-led education intervention.

Cited by 41 publications

References 23 publications

Are diabetes self-management programmes for the general diabetes population effective for people with severe mental illness?: a systematic review

Are diabetes self-management programmes for the general diabetes population effective for people with severe mental illness?: a systematic review

Creation of a Patient-Centered Journey Map to Improve the Patient Experience: A Mixed Methods Approach

<p>Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Reliability of the Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) for Arabic Speaking Patients with Type II Diabetes</p>

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About