2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.5005664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical study on shear buckling capacity of Z-section steel purlin with opening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result of shear capacity drop as the size of the opening gets larger is matched with the research of Basher et al (2009) which mentioned that the reduction of the ultimate shear strength is small and can be neglected when the opening size is small. The finding from De’nan et al (2017a, 2017b, 2017c, 2017d) also supports the result of this analysis. The reduction in shear strength exceeds 40% when the opening depth is half of the girder depth, irrespective of opening shape.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The result of shear capacity drop as the size of the opening gets larger is matched with the research of Basher et al (2009) which mentioned that the reduction of the ultimate shear strength is small and can be neglected when the opening size is small. The finding from De’nan et al (2017a, 2017b, 2017c, 2017d) also supports the result of this analysis. The reduction in shear strength exceeds 40% when the opening depth is half of the girder depth, irrespective of opening shape.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…There are different hinge positions formed for different perforation shapes which contribute to the failure of the beam section. The shear buckling modes for different opening shapes are similar and the shear buckling is significantly around the opening (De’nan et al , 2017a, 2017b, 2017c, 2017d).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From the results, it was figured out that, compared with other opening shapes, C-hexagon openings showed the least reduction in lateral torsional buckling capacity. Regarding of shear tests, De'nan et al [12] studied the behavior of Z-sections with holes under shear strength. It was found that diamond-shaped holes performed better under shear strength than circle-shaped holes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%