2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00190-019-01261-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical study of residual terrain modelling (RTM) techniques and the harmonic correction using ultra-high-degree spectral gravity modelling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under some approximations (cf. Hirt et al, ; Rexer et al, ; also see ESM sections S1 and S3), it facilitates the separate modeling of long‐wavelength (here more than 10 km) and short‐wavelength (less than 10 km) topographic gravity signals, based on the following procedure: The 3″ MERIT topographic surface was accurately expanded into a set of SH coefficients to degree 2,160. We performed an ultrahigh degree SH analysis up to degree 43,200 to mitigate downsampling errors on the estimated coefficients (Hirt et al, ).…”
Section: Methods and Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Under some approximations (cf. Hirt et al, ; Rexer et al, ; also see ESM sections S1 and S3), it facilitates the separate modeling of long‐wavelength (here more than 10 km) and short‐wavelength (less than 10 km) topographic gravity signals, based on the following procedure: The 3″ MERIT topographic surface was accurately expanded into a set of SH coefficients to degree 2,160. We performed an ultrahigh degree SH analysis up to degree 43,200 to mitigate downsampling errors on the estimated coefficients (Hirt et al, ).…”
Section: Methods and Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hirt et al, ; Rexer et al, ; also see ESM sections S1 and S3), it facilitates the separate modeling of long‐wavelength (here more than 10 km) and short‐wavelength (less than 10 km) topographic gravity signals, based on the following procedure: The 3″ MERIT topographic surface was accurately expanded into a set of SH coefficients to degree 2,160. We performed an ultrahigh degree SH analysis up to degree 43,200 to mitigate downsampling errors on the estimated coefficients (Hirt et al, ). The reference surface is rigorously self‐consistent with the 3″ MERIT topographic surface. For modeling the long‐wavelength gravity signal implied by the degree 2,160 SH topography, spectral‐domain techniques as described in, for example, Chao and Rubincam () and Hirt and Kuhn () were used.…”
Section: Methods and Computationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For these points, the direct forward modelling yields the non-harmonic gravitational potential and does therefore not anymore correspond to values observed in harmonic condition, such as observations in the boundary value problem (cf. [34]). It is well-known that some kind of a harmonic correction is required for these points [2].…”
Section: Forward Modelling In Space Domainmentioning
confidence: 99%