1974
DOI: 10.1029/rs009i012p01139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical study of electromagnetic scattering from ocean‐like surfaces

Abstract: The integral equations describing electromagnetic scattering from cylindrical, perfectly conducting surfaces are formulated and numerical results are presented. The results are compared with those obtained using approximate methods such as physical optics, geometrical optics, and perturbation theory. The integral equation solutions show that the surface radius of curvature must be greater than 2.5 wavelengths for either the physical optics or geometrical optics to give satisfactory results. It has also been sh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our method for scattering-pattern calculations can be compared with methods similar to those discussed by Lentz [1974]. As was indicated there, point-matching techniques require several points for each electromagnetic wavelength of the illuminated area and thus are usually limited by computer storage to relatively short illuminated lengths (<60X).…”
Section: In Addition the Rayleigh Approximations To Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our method for scattering-pattern calculations can be compared with methods similar to those discussed by Lentz [1974]. As was indicated there, point-matching techniques require several points for each electromagnetic wavelength of the illuminated area and thus are usually limited by computer storage to relatively short illuminated lengths (<60X).…”
Section: In Addition the Rayleigh Approximations To Thementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since [38], it has been extensively applied to radio wave scattering from the sea surface. In its usual formulation, it involves a regular sampling of the rough surface [17], [39], [40] and can thus be used for linear as well as Creamer surfaces for which the elevation can be explicitly defined at every sampling point.…”
Section: Mom For "Choppy" Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These techniques are limited by the roughness, the incident angle, and so forth. Some numerical methods are also employed, which include the Monte Carlo method [5], the finite difference time-domain (FDTD) [6,7] method, method of moments (MOM) [8,9], the finite element method (FEM) [10], and the forward back method (FBM) [11], the fast multipole method (FMM) [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%