1968
DOI: 10.2514/3.43901
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical solution for the minimum induced drag of nonplanar wings.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Various analytic or low-order studies on minimizing induced drag using lifting-line theory and similar methods have been published since 1933. Whereas many of these studies approach the problem from a purely aerodynamic point of view [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], others follow an approach similar to that taken by Prandtl in 1933 [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Many of the early analytical studies in this second group consider the wing structure independent of the wing geometry.…”
Section:   Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various analytic or low-order studies on minimizing induced drag using lifting-line theory and similar methods have been published since 1933. Whereas many of these studies approach the problem from a purely aerodynamic point of view [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24], others follow an approach similar to that taken by Prandtl in 1933 [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. Many of the early analytical studies in this second group consider the wing structure independent of the wing geometry.…”
Section:   Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of vertical winglets has been estimated by Kuhlman et al [8] and Lundry et al [9], from analyses in the Trefftz plane. The efficiency factor k is defined as the ratio of induced drag coefficient for an elliptically loaded planar wing to the induced drag coefficient of the optimal nonplanar wing/winglet configuration having an equal projected span at equal lift coefficient.…”
Section: Wing and Wingletsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See for example Ref. 31 or the most common reference by Whitcomb (32) . Many designs have been carried out within the 'winglet' category.…”
Section: Far Field Drag Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lifting line theory proposed by Prandtl (20,21) and extended to multiple surfaces by Munk (22) brought huge improvements in the lifting surface arrangements. Their theory has shown Promising mono-surface devices: swept wing tip/conventional winglet/shark winglet (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36) .…”
Section: Jungle Of Existing Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%