2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.01.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical simulation of temperature field in plasma-arc forming of sheet metal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other numerical methods include Finite Differences [13][14][15], Boundary Elements [16,17] and Finite Volumes [18,19]. However, numerical methods are computationally expensive in general, limiting their application to small plate geometries and simple laser trajectories, requiring full time history simulations.…”
Section: Laser Heating/cutting Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other numerical methods include Finite Differences [13][14][15], Boundary Elements [16,17] and Finite Volumes [18,19]. However, numerical methods are computationally expensive in general, limiting their application to small plate geometries and simple laser trajectories, requiring full time history simulations.…”
Section: Laser Heating/cutting Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical methods are the most common simulation approach. Methods such as the Finite Differences Method (FDM) [8,9,10,11] and the Boundary Element Method (BEM) [12,13] have been used in the literature to study the thermal behaviour of sheet laser heating. However, these methods impose several numerical limitations such as dense rectangular grids in the case of FDM and non-sparse linear systems for BEM, requiring a high amount of computational resources even for simple problems.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flexible forming using plasma arc (FFUPA) is a newly developed technique, which produces deformation in metal sheet by thermal stress instead of external mechanical force. Without the requirement of mechanical contact, and hence without the need for hard tooling, it can significantly decrease the high cost and long lead time associated with the production of component specific tooling [2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Male et al firstly demonstrated the feasibility of FFUPA in 2000 [2], then investigated the correlations between process parameters and bending angles of mild steel and stainless steel sheets during line heating, and studied the microstructural development in the heat affected zone [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Male et al firstly demonstrated the feasibility of FFUPA in 2000 [2], then investigated the correlations between process parameters and bending angles of mild steel and stainless steel sheets during line heating, and studied the microstructural development in the heat affected zone [3]. Based on the combination of experiments and numerical simulation, Xu et al conducted a systematical research on the forming mechanism, the rules of FFUPA affected by process parameters and material properties and scanning trajectory [4][5][6]. Wang et al studied the relationship between main process parameters and bending forming through experiments using the metal sheets of 1Cr18Ni9Ti and Q235 [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%