2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.joems.2015.11.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical scheme for the generalized Burgers–Huxley equation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mittal and Jain [54] obtained a numerical solution of nonlinear Burgers equation using a modified cubic B-spline collocation method. Singh et al [55] developed a numerical scheme for solving the GBH equation using modified cubic B-spline differential quadrature method (MCB-DQM) and numerical results can be obtained using SSP-RK43 scheme. Reza [56] implemented the cubic B-spline collocation scheme based on the finite difference scheme for solving the GBH equation.…”
Section: Model IImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mittal and Jain [54] obtained a numerical solution of nonlinear Burgers equation using a modified cubic B-spline collocation method. Singh et al [55] developed a numerical scheme for solving the GBH equation using modified cubic B-spline differential quadrature method (MCB-DQM) and numerical results can be obtained using SSP-RK43 scheme. Reza [56] implemented the cubic B-spline collocation scheme based on the finite difference scheme for solving the GBH equation.…”
Section: Model IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 2 shows a comparison of the absolute errors at = 3.9, = 1, 2, 3 obtained by proposed method HBSCM with the methods existing in the literature named compact finite difference scheme (CFDS) [26], a fourth-order improved numerical scheme (FONS) [33], variational iteration method (VIM) [36], Adomian decomposition method (ADM) [38,40], implicit exponential finite difference method (IEFM) [42], and modified cubic B-spline (MCBS) [55]. The obtained results are compared with Haar wavelet method (HWM) [46] at = 0.8 in Table 3 while a comparison between HBSCM and a new domain decomposition method (NDDA) [22] can be observed in Table 4.…”
Section: Numerical Test Cases For Model Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the combination of the trigonometric cubic B-spline(TCB) collocation method and Crank-Nicolson schme(CNS) is applied to integrate FE into a system of nonlinear equations. Some methods endowed with splines are set up to solve the differential equations [17,20,22,23]. There exist spline based numerical methods for the FE in the literature: The FE is solved numerically by setting up an Galerkin method with cubic B-spline over the finite elements in work [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schemes such as the adomian decomposition [14], homotopy perturbation [15], homotopy analysis [16], and reduced differential transform [17] were proposed to solve the initial value problem of the Burgers-Huxley equation. Moreover, some authors considered the initial boundary value problem of this equation and used spectral collocation [18], finite-difference [19,20], Haar wavelet [21] and modified cubic B-spline differential quadrature [22] methods for its solution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%