15th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference 2014
DOI: 10.2514/6.2014-2173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Numerical Optimization Study on Winglets

Abstract: This paper focuses on aerostructural optimization of wings with winglets. A NewtonKrylov flow solver for the Euler equations is interfaced with a finite-element structures solver for the aerostructural solution. A gradient-based optimizer is used for optimization, where gradients are calculated by the coupled discrete-adjoint method. Pareto fronts of optimal solutions are constructed for weight and drag, which are competing objectives in the context of wing design. Three winglet configurations are considered: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(18 reference statements)
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Applications of CFD-based ASO to wing design have, up until recently, largely focused on the Euler equations [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Contrary to circulation-distribution and panel methods, the Euler equations do not require the user to prescribe the starting location and shape of the wake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Applications of CFD-based ASO to wing design have, up until recently, largely focused on the Euler equations [21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28]. Contrary to circulation-distribution and panel methods, the Euler equations do not require the user to prescribe the starting location and shape of the wake.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More recently, Whitcomb [8] studied the use of smaller wing extensions attached to the wing tips on transonic aircraft and called them "winglets". Further studies have been carried out [9][10][11][12][13][14][15], in which various methods were used to assess the aerodynamics and the assumed structural impact of adding non-planar span extensions, although with no clear consensus regarding the advantage of a non-planar extension over planar extensions. Assessing the aerodynamics of the different wing options, several methods were used, from fully numerical [9] to purely experimental [8,10].…”
Section: Non-planar Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Projected span (m) 15 Two extra panels were added to the wing: one transition panel after the wing tip, and a winglet panel. The purpose of using the transition panel was to allow the application of a toe-out angle to the wing-tip base.…”
Section: Parameter (Unit) Valuementioning
confidence: 99%