A numerical model to reproduce squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Influence of design and material

Piriou, P.; Ouenzerfi, G.; Migaud, Henri; Renault, E.; Massi, Francesco; Serrault, M.

doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2016.03.005

Cited by 13 publications

(10 citation statements)

References 34 publications

(56 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, reports of ceramic head fractures with polyethylene liners are negligible 29) . Furthermore, in this study no cases of squeaking were observed in the CoP group, whereas a squeak incidence of up to 20% was reported for CoC bearings in previous studies 30) . Thus, CoP articulation is gradually spotlighted in an effort to reduce several problems in ceramic components.…”

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 74%

The Wear Rate and Survivorship in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Third-generation Ceramic Head on a Conventional Polyethylene Liner: A Minimum of 15-year Follow-up

Shim

Park

2022

Hip & Pelvis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the wear and survival rates of third-generation ceramic heads on a conventional ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene liner. Materials and Methods A total of 160 hips (147 patients with a mean age of 55.9 years) who underwent total hip arthroplasty using the third-generation ceramic head on a conventional polyethylene liner from March 1998 to August 2003 were reviewed retrospectively. Evaluation of the wear rate for 56 hips (49 patients) followed-up for at least 15 years was performed using the PolyWare program version 8 (Draftware Developers, USA). The Kaplan–Meier survivorship was also evaluated. Results Linear wear and volumetric wear rates were 0.11±0.47 mm/year and 32.75±24.50 mm 3 /year, respectively. Nine revisions were performed during the follow-up period because of cup or stem loosening. The Kaplan–Meier survival rate, using cup revision or total revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) as the endpoint of analysis, was 93.7% at 15 years and 73.6% at 20 years. Conclusion Because all revisions were performed between 15 and 20 years in our study, surgeons should pay greater attention to patients who underwent THA with ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing from 15 years postoperatively. Contemporary alumina ceramic on highly cross-linked polyethylene could certainly be a good alternative bearing couple providing better longevity.

show abstract

Section: Discussioncontrasting

confidence: 74%

The Wear Rate and Survivorship in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Third-generation Ceramic Head on a Conventional Polyethylene Liner: A Minimum of 15-year Follow-up

Shim

Park

2022

Hip & Pelvis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Most commonly (in half of the in vitro studies), implants were subjected to cycling loading and compression. In [70] a pendulum strike was used and in [56], [68], [71] the implants were rotated manually or with robotic arms to produce squeaking. For in vivo implant assessments, walking was employed in eight out of nine studies, whereas squats/crouches, stair ascent/descent and STS were less popular (Supplemental materials: Table V).…”

Section: Implant Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessment of Hip and Knee Joints and Implants Using Acoustic Emission Monitoring: A Scoping Review

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…[28] Furthermore, there were no cases of squeaking in the CoP group in this study, whereas CoC bearings were reported to have a squeak incidence of up to 20% in previous studies. [29] Thus, CoP articulation is gradually spotlighted to reduce several problems in ceramic components. However, the problem with the choice of bearing surface remains controversial, although our results are relatively consistent with those of other previous reports.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Wear Rate and Survivorship in Total Hip Arthroplasty using a Third- Generation Ceramic Head on a Conventional Polyethylene liner: A Minimum of 15-year Follow-up

Shim

Park

Woo

et al. 2021

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Recently, the use of ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) bearing surfaces has increased in the United States with the development of material properties. However, it remains controversial which bearing couples are effective. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the wear and survival rates of third-generation ceramic heads on a conventional polyethylene liner. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 160 hips (147 patients with a mean age of 56 years) who underwent total hip arthroplasty using the third-generation ceramic head on a conventional polyethylene liner from March 1998 to August 2003. The wear rate was evaluated using the PolyWare program Version 8 (Draftware Developers Inc., IN, USA) in 32 hips followed-up for at least 15 years. In addition, we evaluated the Kaplan-Meier survivorship.Results: Linear wear and volumetric wear rates were 0.102±0.57 mm/year and 30.2±27.5 mm3/year, respectively. Fourteen reoperations due to all causes and 10 revisions were performed during the follow-up period. The 15-year survival rate was 84.1% for any surgery as the endpoint and 87.6% for the revision surgery as the endpoint. Most of the causes of revision were cup loosening, and no ceramic head fracture occurred.Conclusions: The CoP bearing surface maintains the advantages of the soft polyethylene surface and has good resistance to wear. Therefore, alumina ceramic on newer polyethylene could certainly be a good alternative bearing couple without any concern for ceramic fractures, especially in younger patients.Level of evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort design

show abstract

A numerical model to reproduce squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Influence of design and material

Abstract: Level IV in vitro study.

Cited by 13 publications

References 34 publications

The Wear Rate and Survivorship in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Third-generation Ceramic Head on a Conventional Polyethylene Liner: A Minimum of 15-year Follow-up

The Wear Rate and Survivorship in Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Third-generation Ceramic Head on a Conventional Polyethylene Liner: A Minimum of 15-year Follow-up

Assessment of Hip and Knee Joints and Implants Using Acoustic Emission Monitoring: A Scoping Review

The Wear Rate and Survivorship in Total Hip Arthroplasty using a Third- Generation Ceramic Head on a Conventional Polyethylene liner: A Minimum of 15-year Follow-up

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About