1979
DOI: 10.1007/bf01396496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical method to boundary value problems for second order delay differential equations

Abstract: Summary. In the first part of this paper we are dealing with theoretical statements and conditions which lead to existence and uniqueness of the solution of a nonlinear boundary value problem with delay. Next we apply this method successfully to a numerical example. The computations have been carried out at the computer Siemens 4004.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BVPs for non-neutral delay differential equations [8,12,28,29,37,38,49,52] BVPs for non-neutral differential equations with deviating arguments [1,3,[9][10][11]19,20,50,51,53] BVPs for non-neutral differential equations with a state-dependent deviating argument θ(t, y(t)) [4] BVPs for non-neutral singularly perturbed differential equations with deviating arguments [31][32][33][34][35] BVPs for the determination of periodic solutions of non-neutral delay differential equations [15,16,18,39,54] BVPs for the determination of periodic solutions of non-neutral delay differential equations with a state-dependent delay [40] BVPs for the determination of periodic solutions of non-neutral differential equations with deviating arguments [6,7] BVPs for non-neutral Fredholm integro-differential equations [21,22,45] BVPs for non-neutral Fredholm integro-differential equations with weakly singular kernels [46][47][48] BVPs for non-neutral Volterra integro-differential equations [23] BVPs for the determination of periodic solutions of neutral delay differential equations [5,17] BVPs for neutral differential equations with st...…”
Section: Numerical Literature On Bvps For Functional Differential Equmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…BVPs for non-neutral delay differential equations [8,12,28,29,37,38,49,52] BVPs for non-neutral differential equations with deviating arguments [1,3,[9][10][11]19,20,50,51,53] BVPs for non-neutral differential equations with a state-dependent deviating argument θ(t, y(t)) [4] BVPs for non-neutral singularly perturbed differential equations with deviating arguments [31][32][33][34][35] BVPs for the determination of periodic solutions of non-neutral delay differential equations [15,16,18,39,54] BVPs for the determination of periodic solutions of non-neutral delay differential equations with a state-dependent delay [40] BVPs for the determination of periodic solutions of non-neutral differential equations with deviating arguments [6,7] BVPs for non-neutral Fredholm integro-differential equations [21,22,45] BVPs for non-neutral Fredholm integro-differential equations with weakly singular kernels [46][47][48] BVPs for non-neutral Volterra integro-differential equations [23] BVPs for the determination of periodic solutions of neutral delay differential equations [5,17] BVPs for neutral differential equations with st...…”
Section: Numerical Literature On Bvps For Functional Differential Equmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the assumption that F(·, v, β) ∈ U for any (v, β) ∈ V × R d 0 , the problem (12) can be restated in the form PAF by introducing the operator F :…”
Section: Other Instances Of the Abstract Formmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using the iterative procedure suggested in [17] for a second order ordinary delay differential equation and finite difference schemes and a finite element method available in the literature for non-delay singularly perturbed differential equations, we, in this paper, propose an iterative method to find a numerical solution for the following singularly perturbed delay differential equations of reaction-diffusion type:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If r is fixed and r ∈ (0, 1), then we need two extra values y h (a + rh) and y h (t 1 − rh) to solve (11) (see (16)); for r = 1 2 only the value y h a + 1 2 h is needed.…”
Section: Then We Havementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can indicate that a shooting method (see for example [12], [19], [22]) and a finite difference method (see [5], [9], [12], [16], [17]) are frequently used for finding a numerical solution of problems of type (1). A collocation method [7] or iterative sequences [11] can also be used (see also [6]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%