2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical method for the exact elastic beam theory. Applications to homogeneous and composite beams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(18 reference statements)
2
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Only in the case of m ¼ 0 the results of various definitions coincide with those of the engineering beam theory. Moreover, the convergence of the obtained results employing the proposed numerical procedure with those obtained from 2-D FEM solutions [19], [26] applied to the same energy formulation and from a 3-D FEM solution [31] applied to the 'exact' elastic beam theory is easily verified. In Figs.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Only in the case of m ¼ 0 the results of various definitions coincide with those of the engineering beam theory. Moreover, the convergence of the obtained results employing the proposed numerical procedure with those obtained from 2-D FEM solutions [19], [26] applied to the same energy formulation and from a 3-D FEM solution [31] applied to the 'exact' elastic beam theory is easily verified. In Figs.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 68%
“…In Table 1 the shear deformation coefficients a z for various values of the Poisson's ratio ı´and the side ratio b=h are presented as compared with those obtained from a 3-D FEM solution [31] of the 'exact' elastic beam theory [29], from a 2-D FEM solution exploiting the principle of minimum potential energy [19], [26] and from the Cowper's definition. From this table the significant influence of the side ratio b=h of the rectangular section to the values of the deformation coefficients a z , contrary to the Cowper's definition is remarkable.…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the proposed shear deformation coefficients compared with those obtained from a 3-D FEM solution of the ÔexactÕ elastic beam theory (Fatmi and Zenzri, 2004) is remarkable.…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 86%
“…In this reference the shear problem is formulated with respect to the principal bending axes system, which as it is stated below is different from the principal shear axes one, while the evaluation of the non-diagonal shear deformation coefficient is missing. Moreover, Fatmi and Zenzri (2004) based on the ÔexactÕ elastic beam theory presented a numerical solution of the shear problem of composite beams of arbitrary crosssection employing the 3-D FEM. The last two references take into account the boundary conditions at the interfaces in contrast with all other research efforts in composite beams of arbitrary cross-section that ignore them (Pilkey, 2002), resulting in an analysis that is not completely rigorous.…”
Section: Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stress field is dependent on a fully three-dimensional function. The ''exact'' beam theory has been applied to compute the stress field of bars under traction boundary conditions, using FEM [4][5][6]. Based on the ''exact'' beam theory and neglecting the Poisson effect, El Fatmi [7] formulated a nonuniform warping theory of bars employing twodimensional St. Venant warping functions and one-dimensional independent warping parameters and provided two alternatives so as to compute shear stresses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%