1999
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1998.6115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Numerical Method for Solving Incompressible Flow Problems with a Surface of Discontinuity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another sharp interface method in which the jump conditions in the coefficients was taken into account in constructing the algorithm was developed in [11] and [12] for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another sharp interface method in which the jump conditions in the coefficients was taken into account in constructing the algorithm was developed in [11] and [12] for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the differences in the methodology, our method distinguishes from [16,29,30] in accuracy, and distinguishes from [11,12] in dealing with different problems. There are some other models and methods for interface problems, notably, the phase field model and the finite volume method, for example, [36].…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Near the interface, the velocity of the unreacted material contains large O(1) numerical errors where it has been nonphysically forced to be continuous with the velocity of the reacted material. Partial solutions to these problems where proposed in [9] where the authors were able to remove the numerical smearing of the normal velocity obtaining a sharp interface profile. Unfortunately, the interface treatment in [9] was considerably intricate and the calculation had to be terminated if two flame fronts were significantly close to each other, i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partial solutions to these problems where proposed in [9] where the authors were able to remove the numerical smearing of the normal velocity obtaining a sharp interface profile. Unfortunately, the interface treatment in [9] was considerably intricate and the calculation had to be terminated if two flame fronts were significantly close to each other, i.e. this method cannot handle the simple merging of flame discontinuities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The previously mentioned body-fitted grid and the moving unstructured grid methods are examples of these attempts. Another, more recent, approach is to retain the stationary structured grid and improve the interface treatment by, for example, introducing special difference formulas that incorporate the jump across the interface [45][46][47][48]. One of these is the Ghost Fluid method, in which the jump conditions that hold at the interface are captured implicitly.…”
Section: Numerical Methods For Two Phase Flowsmentioning
confidence: 99%