2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2018.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical method for predicting the hydroelastic response of marine propellers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current BEM and FEM models have undertaken extensive numerical convergence and experimental validation experiments, which are described in Li et al [21][22][23]27 To further verify the present BEM codes, several examples are used. The steady pressure distributions of a three-blade propeller, namely the propeller 4119, are employed to assess the accuracy of the current approach for estimating the propellers' open-water performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The current BEM and FEM models have undertaken extensive numerical convergence and experimental validation experiments, which are described in Li et al [21][22][23]27 To further verify the present BEM codes, several examples are used. The steady pressure distributions of a three-blade propeller, namely the propeller 4119, are employed to assess the accuracy of the current approach for estimating the propellers' open-water performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…defined in equation ( 10), the reader is referred to the authors' previous works. 22,27 In order to obtain equation (10), the expression 9)) should be expanded in a vector form as:…”
Section: Boundary Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Among the viscous flow methods, URANS (Unsteady-Reynolds-Averaged-Navier-Stokes) methods are the most commonly used, as the prohibitive computation times of LES (Large-Eddy-Simulation), DES (Detached-Eddy-Simulation) and DNS (Direct Numerical Simulation) methods make them suitable only for low Reynolds numbers. Moreover, even though URANS methods yields better hydrodynamic performance prediction and more accurate modelling of the turbulent flow surrounding a marine propeller, the computational efficiency of panel methods makes them highly competitive, and they are thus still widely in use, with new improvements (Li et al, 2018(Li et al, , 2017. Concerning the structure numerical methods employed for the study of FSI on marine composite structures, Finite Element (FE) modelling involving both conventional solid elements for modelling of the homogenized structure, and conventional (thin) shell elements and continuum (thick) shell elements for a ply-by-ply modelling have been used.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%