1999
DOI: 10.1115/1.2841233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Numerical Investigation of Transonic Axial Compressor Rotor Flow Using a Low-Reynolds-Number k–ε Turbulence Model

Abstract: We have developed a computer simulation code for three-dimensional viscous flow in turbomachinery based on the time-averaged compressible Navier–Stokes equations and a low-Reynolds-number k–ε turbulence model. It is described in detail in this paper. The code is used to compute the flow fields for two types of rotor (a transonic fan NASA Rotor 67 and a transonic axial compressor NASA rotor 37), and numerical results are compared to experimental data based on aerodynamic probe and laser anemometer measurements.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This rotor has 36 blades, nominal speed 17188.7 r/min, and a design pressure ratio of 2.106 at a mass flow of 20.19 kg·s −1 .This test case has been computed by numerous researchers. Various theoretical predictions from different codes [15][16][17][18][19] and detailed experimental data [20,21] will be very useful in calibrating numerical tools. Therefore, Rotor 37 is preferred as a test case to assess the predictive capabilities of turbomachinery CFD tools.…”
Section: Nasa Rotor 37mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rotor has 36 blades, nominal speed 17188.7 r/min, and a design pressure ratio of 2.106 at a mass flow of 20.19 kg·s −1 .This test case has been computed by numerous researchers. Various theoretical predictions from different codes [15][16][17][18][19] and detailed experimental data [20,21] will be very useful in calibrating numerical tools. Therefore, Rotor 37 is preferred as a test case to assess the predictive capabilities of turbomachinery CFD tools.…”
Section: Nasa Rotor 37mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a clearer comparison, Figure 2 depicts almost the same values, but averaged over all individuals in one generation; as only the controlled generations (i.e., the generations in which the CFD simulations are conducted) are considered, the horizontal axis approximately scales with the amount of computation. ApxN N (1) ApxN N (2) ApxN N (3) ApxN N (1) Figure 2: Results normalized to the number of controlled generations (i.e., proportional to the number of CFD evaluations)…”
Section: Optimization Results With Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second type of NN models (ApxN N (2) ) are obtained using evolutionary structure optimization, as discussed in Section 2.1, i.e., the NNs are optimized with regard to the approximation accuracy of all data points collected during the first seven control cycles of a different evolutionary run. The third type of models (ApxN N (3) ) result from using structure optimization with respect to its learning ability for ν = 7 different problems stemming from the first control cycles of a different design optimization trial; we use the value γ = 0.5 in the averaged Lamarckian inheritance (1). For all types of models, after η generations of each control cycle in the design optimization online adaptation of the weights is performed for τ = 50 iRprop + iterations.…”
Section: Optimization Results With Neural Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In our work, a 3D Navier-Stokes flow solver, HSTAR3D (Arima et al, 1999) is employed, which usually takes from two to four hours on an AMD Opteron 2 GHz double processor depending on the convergence speed of the fluid dynamics. To reduce computation time, a two-level parallel computing architecture has been adopted.…”
Section: An Examplementioning
confidence: 99%