2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2012.02.071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A numerical investigation of the refrigerant maldistribution from a header towards parallel channels in an evaporator of automotive air conditioning system

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3) Space with a font size 10 =h 2b -h 3 (4) Then the heat transfer of the air across the condenser can be calculated according to the difference bulb temperature between the air inlet and air outlet temperatures as given in the following equation [8].…”
Section: =H 2 -H 2amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(3) Space with a font size 10 =h 2b -h 3 (4) Then the heat transfer of the air across the condenser can be calculated according to the difference bulb temperature between the air inlet and air outlet temperatures as given in the following equation [8].…”
Section: =H 2 -H 2amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the surface temperature ( ) is constant across the condenser, then the heat balance can be expressed by [8].…”
Section: ̇ (9)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the studies in the Literature about the problem of the maldistribution of the refrigerant mass flowrate among the different refrigerant channels have been carried out in micro channel evaporators (Brix et al, 2010(Brix et al, , 2009Gong et al, 2008;Kaern et al, 2011;Stevanovic et al, 2012), or in fin and tube evaporators (Bach et al, 2013;Choi et al, 2003;Mader et al, 2015) showing that the maldistribution in the air side has even a higher impact on the system performance than the maldistribution in the refrigerant side and reporting estimations of the COP degradation ranging from 5% to 40% depending on the evaporator and conditions analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%