2014
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-15-s1-s7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nucleosomal approach to inferring causal relationships of histone modifications

Abstract: MotivationHistone proteins are subject to various posttranslational modifications (PTMs). Elucidating their functional relationships is crucial toward understanding many biological processes. Bayesian network (BN)-based approaches have shown the advantage of revealing causal relationships, rather than simple cooccurrences, of PTMs. Previous works employing BNs to infer causal relationships of PTMs require that all confounders should be included. This assumption, however, is unavoidably violated given the fact … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To incorporate these hidden associations, a new treemap visualization scheme for the directly associated concepts and treemap with linking where co-occurrences are the relation strength measure the indirectly associated concepts [123]. This web tool has been used to extract information about the indirect interactions between post-translational modifications of histone proteins [129].…”
Section: Web-based Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To incorporate these hidden associations, a new treemap visualization scheme for the directly associated concepts and treemap with linking where co-occurrences are the relation strength measure the indirectly associated concepts [123]. This web tool has been used to extract information about the indirect interactions between post-translational modifications of histone proteins [129].…”
Section: Web-based Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ENCODE identified conditional-dependence relationships among groups of up to approximately 100 data sets in specific genomic contexts [ 20 ]. Other authors used partial correlation on 21 data sets [ 32 ], Bayesian networks for 38 data sets [ 34 ], and partial correlation combined with penalized regression for 27 human data sets [ 49 ] and for 139 mouse embryonic stem cell data sets [ 25 ]. Still other authors used a Markov random field with 73 data sets in D. melanogaster [ 65 ], a Boltzmann machine with 116 human transcription factors [ 40 ], and bootstrapped Bayesian networks in 112 regulatory factors in D. melanogaster [ 3 , 57 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%