2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-4371(00)00146-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A nuclear magnetic resonance answer to the Boltzmann–Loschmidt controversy?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
144
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
144
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These used mainly the interacting 1 H nuclei in organic crystals and liquid crystals in a number of configurations and settings [7,8,10]. As a whole, the experiments were consistent with the fact that the experimental T 3 never exceeds more than a few times T 2 .…”
Section: A Brief History Of Time Reversalsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These used mainly the interacting 1 H nuclei in organic crystals and liquid crystals in a number of configurations and settings [7,8,10]. As a whole, the experiments were consistent with the fact that the experimental T 3 never exceeds more than a few times T 2 .…”
Section: A Brief History Of Time Reversalsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The relaxation time T 2 is directly related to the secular dipolar Hamiltonian and the same holds for T 3 . This is precisely the case that motivated the Central Hypothesis of Irreversibility [8], which essentially manifests that the many-body dynamics amplifies the effect of experimental imperfections and uncontrolled degrees of freedom. In an isolated molecule this would yield some characteristic time scale T Σ , but in a crystal presents a decoherence time T 3 , proportional to T 2 instead of T Σ .…”
Section: Implementations Of Time-reversal In Nuclear Magnetic Resonanmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A hypersensitivity of time reversal to perturbations was observed in recent NMR experiments on many-body spin systems [9] [10]. In essence, these experiments [11] [12] involve the creation of a local density excitation represented by a state |0 which evolves under a many-spin Hamiltonian H. The Loschmidt Echo (LE) is the probability to return to the initial state when a Hamiltonian evolution for a time t is followed by an identical period of imperfect reversal of that evolution, achieved by the transformation H → −(H + Σ), i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In these systems, universal control has been achieved by implementing collective control together with suitable spin manipulation at the chain ends [20,21]. All these fine control attempts might be frustrated by decoherence [22,23,24]. Thus, the dependence of decoherence on nuclear spin network topology becomes an important issue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%