The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2022.124957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel wind power prediction approach using multivariate variational mode decomposition and multi-objective crisscross optimization based deep extreme learning machine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific allocation methods are listed in table 6. The same training and test sequence samples were used to experiment with the PSO-least squares support vector machine (PSO-LSSVM) [47], long short-term memory (LSTM) [48], DELM [15], SSAE [49], recurrent neural network (RNN) [50], and dung beetle optimizer optimizes DELM (DBO-DELM) [51], and compared with the proposed model.…”
Section: The Proposed Model Performance Validation Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The specific allocation methods are listed in table 6. The same training and test sequence samples were used to experiment with the PSO-least squares support vector machine (PSO-LSSVM) [47], long short-term memory (LSTM) [48], DELM [15], SSAE [49], recurrent neural network (RNN) [50], and dung beetle optimizer optimizes DELM (DBO-DELM) [51], and compared with the proposed model.…”
Section: The Proposed Model Performance Validation Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although most studies of ML algorithms based on MSS have skyrocketing prediction effects on tool wear values, the stability of model predictions is ignored. The stability of model predictions refers to the ability to maintain ideal prediction performance in the face of new data [15]. Therefore, considering the precision and smoothness of tool wear prediction under complex machining environments, different processing parameters, and different tools remains a challenge for some learning models [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhang et al [122] applied the improved sine and cosine algorithm (ISCA) to optimize the parameters of the BiLSTM model, achieving superior optimization results compared to the standard SCA. In [123], to ensure the accuracy and stability of WPP, the key parameters of the DELM model underwent optimization through multi-objective crisscross optimization (MOCSO). In [105], an improvement to the PSO was employed to optimize the optimal number of hidden neurons and the optimal learning rate for the LSTM model, significantly enhancing the short-term accuracy of WPP.…”
Section: Parameter Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ISCA [122], MOCSO [123], PSO [105], IChOA [124], SSO [125], HBO [130], MOECO [126], JADE [127], MOSMA [128], CSSOA [129]…”
Section: Parameter Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%