2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22093555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Novel Walking Activity Recognition Model for Rotation Time Series Collected by a Wearable Sensor in a Free-Living Environment

Abstract: Solutions to assess walking deficiencies are widespread and largely used in healthcare. Wearable sensors are particularly appealing, as they offer the possibility to monitor gait in everyday life, outside a facility in which the context of evaluation biases the measure. While some wearable sensors are powerful enough to integrate complex walking activity recognition models, non-invasive lightweight sensors do not always have the computing or memory capacity to run them. In this paper, we propose a walking acti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 7 denotes that diverse behavioral data can improve the identification of students' MDs. The research of Brad et al also shows that the more data types are, the higher the efficiency of model recognition [ 33 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7 denotes that diverse behavioral data can improve the identification of students' MDs. The research of Brad et al also shows that the more data types are, the higher the efficiency of model recognition [ 33 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quaternion pose representation has no singular points at the Euler angle. However, the conversion from quaternions to Euler angles generates discontinuities or singular points [7][8][9][10]. The transformations from quaternions to Euler angles φ, θ, and ψ are shown in Eq.…”
Section: Continuous Self-location Estimation Methods Using Micro-quat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support Vector Machine SVM 0.72 [47] 0.88 ± 0.14 0.85 [14] 0.74 [48] Random Forest 0.88 [49] 0.85 ± 0.16 0.88 [50] 0.86 [14] Decision Tree 0.82 [47] 0.77 ± 0.17 0.83 [51] 0.80 [14] k Nearest Neighbors 0.75 [47] 0.89 ± 0.06 0.74 [49] 0.68 [50] Figure 4. Confusion matrix for the segmentation and classification steps of our processing pipeline.…”
Section: Type Of Classifiers Reported Performances Performances On Ou...mentioning
confidence: 99%