2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02018.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A novel two‐dimensional dynamic anal ultrasonography technique to assess anismus comparing with three‐dimensional echodefecography

Abstract: Two-dimensional dynamic anal ultrasonography can be used as an alternative method to assess patients with anismus, although the 3-D modality is more precise to evaluate the PR angle as the sphincters integrity as the whole muscle length is clearly visualized.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Murad-Regadas et al (23) described a novel technique for the assessment of anismus using 2D-DAUS with satisfactory results and substantial agreement with 3D-DAUS findings. In the present study, 2D-DAUS agreed moderately with anorectal manometry, identifying 23 of 30 patients with normal relaxation and 16 of 19 patients with anismus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, Murad-Regadas et al (23) described a novel technique for the assessment of anismus using 2D-DAUS with satisfactory results and substantial agreement with 3D-DAUS findings. In the present study, 2D-DAUS agreed moderately with anorectal manometry, identifying 23 of 30 patients with normal relaxation and 16 of 19 patients with anismus.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The movement of the PR muscle was quantified by measuring changes in the angle between two converging lines drawn from the 3 o'clock and the 9 o'clock positions of the endoprobe circumference to the 6 o'clock position on the internal border of the PR muscle. The angle decreases at least 1° during straining in patients with normal relaxation, but increases at least 1° in patients with anismus (23) . The same patient should be compared at rest with straining.…”
Section: Dynamic Anal Ultrasonographymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The increase in puborectalis angle between the resting and straining is > 1° in normal individuals. Less than 1° increase indicates paradoxical contraction of PR, which is a clinically significant sign for the diagnosis of animus[14]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%